I was at Netroots UK on Saturday. Others will blog this event in more detail than I will, I’m sure. But it is, for me this was a really useful event.
I’ve been blogging for more than four years now. Back then it was still relatively rare and other social media were rarer still. Now there are blogs galore — and I’m not complaining. And the whole social media phenomenon has developed to the point that politics is inconceivable without thinking about its use.
It’s great that those from the left of centre are now well aware of this. Driven by sites like Liberal Conspiracy and Left Foot Forward alternatives are being made available for those who are politically aware of the massive intellectual deficit within neoliberal thinking. I hope in some way to have contributed to this.
But the event was also interesting in other ways. First, with so much obviously going on it occurs to me that I can withdraw from some things I’ve been doing. Some of the broader commentary I’ve offered is now very obviously available in increasing quantity elsewhere and I’ve never been one for doing what is not needed. I would rather play to my strengths. That even relates to some issues on tax avoidance. When even the Daily Mail campaigns against corporation tax avoidance (in their case on Cadburys) it can reasonably be argued to have made such real progress that others can now more than ably take some aspects of that issue forward.
One other particularly useful feature of the day was the opportunity to talk to a few really experienced bloggers about their experience of the process. Something we all agreed on is that this is much harder work than we had ever appreciated. Keeping a blog going and dealing with moderation (and, let’s be candid, some of the hassle that comes with it) is hard work, especially when there’s another job or two to do as well. That confirmed a very strong feeling I have had on the return from the Christmas break. I can’t help but say it, but the break from the blog and the fact that almost no one commented for a while was quite enjoyable.
What does all this make me feel? Well, I’m expecting to blog less. I might twitter a bit more (which is now 50% of social media traffic, apparently) and on the blog I’m expecting to focus on research and even learning materials more. One good session I attended was on using video. I expect to be doing more of this. It was one reason for the Mac transition.
And on comments? Fascinating input here. I’ll quote Tim Montgomerie of Conservative Home, who was at the event. He says blogs are about preaching to the choir. In other words they’re about getting the choir to sing better from the communal hymn sheet. Those who want to sing out of tune are not welcome. And nor are those who want to sing something else. As a result Tim Montgomerie admits Conservative Home deleted all comments they thought from the far right for a long period (and maybe they still do) — and that’s UKIP and onwards. Why did they do that? Because they felt just allowing the comments on might have discredited the site. I know the feeling! And as he put it, about 97% of the content on the internet is rubbish, a ratio that he reckoned might be slightly lower for comments, but where 85% to 90% fell into that category. If they block the path to good content — and we were sufficiently mutually respectful to recognise the contribution each tries to make in this respect without seeking to agree with each other on politics — then comments deserve not to make it. In fact to be fair to him, his praise for this blog was high, and appreciated.
Another interesting tale confirmed by several bloggers I know who are reliable commentators is that many more right wing sites are now editing out most left of centre comment. The Taxpayer’s Alliance is one who is now definitely doing this. I would hate to be so partisan but the idea that the web is somehow a space where anything goes and there are no rules for appropriate engagement is just anarchic — and democrats need to be wary of such thinking. I do not want to live in an anarchic world — and distrust those who do. Those who think otherwise are also those most likely to make ad hominem attacks. And that’s a wholly unsavoury form of blogging, and politics.
So be warned, change is on the way. There are though, I hope, some quite interesting things that will come out on the blog as a result. But let’s wait and see; for now less but more focussed content and a greater use of the delete button may well be the most obvious change.
If that keeps up my enthusiasm for the process that’s good. Because one thing another commentator noted is that of the top left wing blogs from two years ago almost none are now left. To go back to near the beginning of this piece, I’m not surprised: doing a blog is hard work and sometimes more than a little bit thankless.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Hi Richard, just a short note to say how useful I’m finding your posts, they are helping me go out into the world and counter the myths peddled by the ConDems. I really appreciate the time you put into the blog as I’m sure many others do as well.
Martin
@martin
Thanks
And to those who have sent direct messages
[…] Packman has a report from Netroots At Third Estate, Owen also has brief thoughts Richard Murphy From Tax Research also writes about the event. Gary Banham did not appreciate the Labour […]
The paradoxical problem arising from so much stuff being available on the ‘net is that it gets harder to find what you want amongst it all. Although there may be dozens of others doing similar analyses to yourself, I only occasionally follow a link to them, whereas I know it has been worth regularly checking yours.
So I hope that you are not going to cut down too much: I have found this blog interesting, informative and thought-provoking.
Allowing sane right-wing comments that you can answer also adds to the substance of this blog, I think. Blocking them altogether would not improve the overall product.
Richard,
Your blog is excellent. I agree with David, and if you are going to cut down on the area you cover, please give us links to what we should be reading. I can just about keep up with your blog, and about one or two others.
Cheers
Hi Richard, I agree with the three previous comments. I hear what you say about not doing what’s not needed. Just wanted to let you know your blog is my absolute favourite which I have recommended to many people and I would have followed it for the next 100 years if you’d have continued exactly in the way you have been over these last years.
Time is precious for all of us and it’s never been wasted writing or reading your blog. Thank you for your efforts, dedication and time. Really appreciate it, thank you.
Hi Richard, A couple of ways of preserving your sanity 🙂
You could give someone else authority over the delete button for rants ad-hominem attacks etc, and a feature I like is where users vote down a comment. It is suppressed but available (I like seeing just what was so obnoxious occasionally)
Also where people are of a like mind you could allow guest blogs. This would allow you to keep the shape and direction of the blog (being your creation) ,extend its reach and allow you to direct your focus.
I don’t agree with everything you publish, but appreciate the blog. It gives you alot of credibility, and if you added more links would be another reason to visit regularly.
Cheers
Stephen
[…] wrote my reflection on Netroots UK, saying I would be using the delete button more, on Saturday afternoon, although I waited to Sunday […]
[…] wrote my reflection on Netroots UK, saying I would be using the delete button more, on Saturday afternoon, although I waited to Sunday […]