Are we at a tipping point? Could the growing wave of protests around the world signal the beginning of the end of neoliberalism and the emergence of a fundamentally different political and economic system?
For more than 40 years, neoliberalism has dominated political and economic policy. It has promised prosperity, opportunity and freedom. But inequality has increased, housing has become unaffordable, public services have deteriorated, and economic insecurity has grown.
Now people are demanding change.
Across Europe and beyond, protests are challenging the political and economic status quo. Young people, particularly Generation Z, are at the forefront. Their demands vary, but the underlying frustration is remarkably similar: the existing system is failing to meet their needs.
In this video, I ask whether these protests could represent a tipping point, when accumulated dissatisfaction finally produces fundamental political change.
I consider the research of Harvard professor Erica Chenoweth into how relatively small movements can achieve extraordinary results.
Then, I explore why changing governments may not be enough when the economic assumptions underpinning their policies remain unchanged.
But there is another question. If neoliberalism is approaching its end, what replaces it?
Rejecting the existing system is not enough. We need a credible alternative.
I argue that this must involve an economics of hope and a politics of care, putting people, democracy and collective well-being before the demands of markets.
So, are we witnessing a historic turning point, or merely the beginning of a much longer struggle for change? Time will tell.
This is the audio version:
This is the transcript:
Is neoliberalism approaching a tipping point? It's a question I need to ask because, well, it feels like it is, doesn't it?
Protests are spreading around the world. Young people are demanding change. Neoliberalism has dominated us for the last 40 years, but its promises have failed.
So could its end be approaching? Are we now at the point where there is going to be the momentum to deliver a new political system for the UK, for the USA, for Europe and well beyond? That's the question of the moment.
And the fact is that people are withdrawing their consent for neoliberal rule. Neoliberalism has created massive disquiet, and people have had enough of inequality. They've had enough of austerity. They want security and opportunity, and they want something more than a good government. They want a system that reflects their well-being and their future. And that is why so many young people in particular are now on the streets of countries protesting.
To me, it looks like a tipping point is arriving. What is a tipping point? It's a moment of fundamental change. Small events can trigger enormous consequences when a tipping point arrives. We never can anticipate precisely what will create this outcome. We can never decide why one particular small event is sufficient to create the momentum for a massive change.
But it happens, and that's because pressures accumulate over many years, and then change can happen very quickly. Sometimes it can't be reversed. Could neoliberalism be approaching that moment?
The world is protesting against failed neoliberal policies. France, Germany, Italy, and Portugal, the Netherlands, Spain, and Serbia, India, Bangladesh, and Mexico. All of them, and the UK as well to some degree, are showing signs of discontent.
Generation Z, Gen Z, is helping lead the protests. It is at the forefront of the demand for change because, very obviously, young people can see that neoliberalism is not offering them any form of return in the way it did to previous generations.
And why are young people protesting?
They're protesting about education in some countries. They want more investment in themselves so that they can partake in society. And why not?
They're protesting about climate change.
In Germany, they're protesting about military service.
In Spain and Portugal, they're protesting about housing costs.
In the UK, people are protesting about Palestine.
The point is, there is no one common theme. The failures are, however, all connected. In every case, the failure is of neoliberalism and its demands of people that they comply with its requirements, when, so obviously, those requirements are not producing desirable outcomes.
Neoliberalism has failed to deliver prosperity. Inequality has increased. Housing has become unaffordable for many. Public services have deteriorated. Jobs have disappeared. Economic insecurity has grown, and people increasingly want something different. They reject the rentier society in which we live, which extracts money from them by way of interest charges and by way of rents. They are upset by monopoly profits. They want genuine opportunities. They've had enough.
And as a consequence, politics is changing around the world.
Brazil and Serbia have shown in the last few weeks what political discontent looks like.
America's midterm elections, the result of which I do not yet know because this is being recorded while people are still voting, will test Trump's support. As far as we can see, the Democrats are way ahead. But will that be enough to keep people happy? I doubt it.
There is a demand for new politics, and we're seeing that. We're seeing the rise of the far-right. We're also now seeing the decline of the far-right. In the UK, we can see that. Nigel Farage is a busted flush. His moment has been, and it's gone.
People are fed up with his corruption or what looks to be corruption. We haven't yet seen it proved, but they don't like the taint of big money being given to him for his own use as a consequence of his politics.
They don't like his authoritarian style either. People want freedom. They don't want to see governments made up of people who are going to tell them what to do and pick on others.
And even the power of big tech is being questioned. Time and time again, people are saying ‘no' to AI, its data centres and everything that goes with it. They question: what is the value of this technology? And they're doing that in part because it is so heavily associated with the politics of oppression, which the far-right in the USA and elsewhere are fueling. Elon Musk is the biggest enemy of AI because of how he is using the money that he has earned from it.
And these protests are about the economic system, and they are systemic. They're not saying we don't like a party. They're saying we don't like any party that subscribes to this style of thinking.
In the UK, I've called this the problem of the ‘single transferable party'. The Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats have all sounded similar when it comes to economic policy, and people are saying: ‘Changing government is not, then, enough. We want to change the system itself.'
We want to get rid of markets dominating political decision-making. We want to put people at the epicentre of politics. We want people's interests to be at the centre of the concern of any future government. And they understand that at this moment they could, by their actions, make a difference. They could topple the neoliberal regime in all its forms.
Now, Erica Chenoweth has created a theory around this. She's a Harvard professor, and she's looked at how small movements can create enormous change. This is the theory of the tipping point. And her research has identified that when 3.5% of the population participate in a pattern of demand for reform, that demand can be sustained. And, as a consequence, change happens.
There are some important criteria to fulfil, though. Sustained organisation matters as much as numbers, and clear demands help make movements more effective.
So could today's protests become those that create the tipping point in accordance with her theory? Well, they might.
But the question is, what replaces neoliberalism? Rejecting it is not enough. People need a credible alternative. The economy must meet people's needs in the future, and public services must take priority over market outsourcing. Government must reclaim its economic role to keep people happy, and democracy must replace the rule by markets and those who dominate large companies and their finance.
So, is the tipping point approaching? Is the coherence of the argument for the alternative good enough as yet? I don't know. It may be. We could be on the cusp of a tipping point, and protests clearly show that there is a growing sense of rejection of what we've had. Young people are demanding something better, and the existing political consensus is weakening, as is the far-right challenge to it.
So a shared alternative could trigger fundamental change. But are we really witnessing that process at the moment? Are we looking at the end of neoliberalism? Or are we just looking at the beginning of that end, where the awareness has finally arrived that we must have something else, but we have yet to give rise to the arguments?
And what happens then? Do we go through a period of an interregnum where the old neoliberalism is dead, but the new has yet to be born? That's a Gramscian phase, I'm well aware, but the point is we could go through that turmoil. We might have several years where we do not know where we're going.
But the fact is, this is the moment where I think we need an economics of hope, hope for people, in other words, and a politics of care. And that means everybody matters. That has not been true in the economy we've had.
We need to build those two things, economics of hope for people and the politics of care for those who would otherwise be left behind, so that we have an inclusive society in which everyone from Gen Z upwards, and indeed those who follow them, can believe they have a chance in the world in which we live.
That is where we are. That is what I think is our direction of travel.
But that's what I think. What do you think? There is, of course, a poll down below.
Poll
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

Buy me a coffee!

[…] I noted in this morning's video, Gen Z are leading a political transformation in many countries around the world. I look forward to […]
As Viv Stanshall put it in Sir Henry at Rawlinsons End
I dont know what I want but I want it now!
Thanks again for a timely, analytical article.
Here are some possible alternative presented by AI overview which, adopted or not, might focus feelings and thoughts:
1) Doughnut Economics
2) Economy for the Common Good
3) Community Wealth Building/The Preston Model
4) The Commons and Universal Services Model
P. S. Might an alternative focus on resouce creation and equitable access rather than financialisation?
P. P. S. Might a non/minimal rentier group be an attribute of an alternative to Neoliberalism?
Those help
None are macro that I know of, and that is the problem.
We have a macro problem.
That is why I am doing macro.
Neoliberalism is the pattern that connects.
People are sick of neoliberal abuse. People are afraid of the consequences of the neoliberal polycrisis a league of barbaric civil wars at a time of ecological collapse.
We’ve reached that point.
We agree
I suggest that part of the problem is that, even now, many in the general public don’t know what neoliberalism is and what it’s doing/how it operates. Nor do they associate it with the maldistribution in our society.
The word is spreading, but too many just don’t seem to want to listen and understand.
For example, back at the last General Election a comment I heard, “Neoliberals, they’re a wing of the LibDems aren’t they?”
It makes me sad and perhaps a bit angry.
I think there is an important distinction here. People may not know the word neoliberalism, or be able to explain the ideology, but that does not mean they do not recognise what it does.
They know that public services are failing, that wealth and power are increasingly concentrated, that their economic security is being undermined and that politicians seem unwilling to change things. They know they do not like the consequences, even if they cannot name their cause.
That is why I think explaining neoliberalism matters. People already recognise much of what is wrong. What they lack is the language to connect those experiences, understand why they are happening and realise that alternatives exist.
My task is not to tell people what to dislike. They already know that. It is to help them understand what they are confronting so that they can do something about it.
Thank you and well said, Richard.
There were protests in Mauritius, too, last month. The cost of living crisis and what is perceived as prioritising wealthy and tax dodging immigrants from South Africa, Europe and North America, a proliferation of western style golf estates, led to some violence and curfews.
It’s worth delving deeper than the congressional results in the US. People power, not just youngsters, voted in local restrictions on data centre building, the sort of thing we need here and elsewhere. (NB it was disappointing that Democrat Angie Nixon narrowly failed to win in Florida after Israel firster Schumer helped her opponent.) As Richard says on another post, corporate power must also be rejected.
It’s not just Trump and his current vehicle, the Republicans. Having often worked in the US, including on regulatory policy, from 2006 – 19, I observed how the Democrats are for the oligarchy as much as the Republicans. Readers should note that Trump, Kushner and Epstein were registered Democrats and donors until the reign of Obama. JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon is a Democrat. New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker is called Corporate Hooker. NY Democrat Hakeem Jefferies is called Aipac Shakur.
‘Could not agree more Colonel – one U.S. wit said that the Republicans were ‘the party of bad ideas’ and the Democrats as the party of ‘no ideas’.
The documentary ‘Lifting the Veil’ – about how the modern U.S. Democratic party became the graveyard of progressive politics needs to be watched- search it out – its revelations could also apply to the so-called opposition parties in the UK.
I’d like to think a tipping point has been reached. But what I also see as things worsen, is people of all sorts of backgrounds gravitating to thinking that a factor like God will somehow intervene – that their faith will be enough. This troubles me because my view about religion is that it tells us much about the proper way to treat each other. But the issue that seems to be beyond the faith portion is that it can only be human beings themselves who make those changes in the here and now – not some sort of divine intervention. It’s as if too many people want change but no responsibility for effecting it. Therefore religion becomes a coping mechanism and not really a source of change – a wish, but nothing more – oh and by the way, don’t worry, things will be better………….when you are dead?!
It is certainly still worth trying to empower people with the growing knowledge of this blog. What the blog advocates is inline with much of the best that religion tries to mentor to us about how to live with others. We have chosen to put our faith in human Neo-liberalism. It has failed. But this should not be the end of faith in human ideas, it is time to show faith and courage in something new.
It seems the Pope has been reading your blog. Just said this.
“The exercise of political authority must always be directed towards the common good, which must be structured and operate according to local and historical circumstances, but always with the good of the entire human family at heart,” said Leo. (from the Guardian)
He is right