Fifty years ago, in the long hot summer of 1976, I went to university to study economics. Since that time, I have spent half a century reading, writing, teaching, researching, campaigning, and thinking about that subject in some way or other.
To mark that anniversary, and the twentieth anniversary of the Funding the Future blog from which this YouTube channel grew, I have written a new free ebook examining fifty thinkers who have shaped my understanding of economics and society.
Some are familiar names, including John Maynard Keynes, Karl Marx, Adam Smith, Amartya Sen, Stephanie Kelton and Steve Keen.
Others may come as a surprise as the book also includes philosophers, scientists, campaigners and social critics whose ideas helped me understand how economies really work, why societies succeed or fail, and what creates human wellbeing.
In this video, I explain why I wrote the book, how my fascination with economics began through reading railway history as a teenager, and why I still believe ideas matter. The questions these thinkers raised about money, markets, power, justice, democracy and human flourishing remain as important today as ever.
The ebook is more than 200 pages long and is available free of charge. There is no obligation to donate. My aim is simply to share the ideas that have influenced me over the last fifty years and to encourage debate about the kind of economy and society we want to create.
You can download the ebook using this link. If you do read it, I would be delighted to hear what you think.
This is the audio version:
This is the transcript:
Fifty years ago, I went to university to study economics. 1976 delivered us a long, hot summer and the beginning of my economics career. I've spent every one of the intervening years reading, writing, and thinking about economics. This week I've tried to distil what that half-century of thinking has taught me. The result is a free ebook available right now from my blog. It's more than 200 pages long, and it will cost you precisely nothing. If that interests you, stay with me for the next few minutes.
That new ebook is now available from my Funding the Future Blog. It covers fifty economic thinkers and the key questions that each of them has raised. Each of the thinkers is examined for their significance and why they matter for where we are today.
Please note that while you'll be asked if you want to donate, that is entirely optional, so please download it, read it, and share it.
Why fifty thinkers? Well, that's because there are two anniversaries I am celebrating this year. The first, as I've just mentioned, is my fiftieth anniversary of going to university to study economics. The second is the twentieth anniversary of starting my Funding the Future blog, out of which this channel grew. There's a link to that down below as well. Both those anniversaries felt worth celebrating, and fifty seemed the right number to mark them. I could, in fact, have included fifty-two since I started studying economics for a level at the age of 16, but somehow university felt much more significant. At that point, I had made the choice to put economics at the centre of my life, and that, as a matter of fact, is where it has always been.
My fascination with the subject began as a teenager, and I got into it through reading railway history. Like many teenagers at that time, teenage boys in particular, I was a railway enthusiast, but unlike most of my friends at school who were into this subject, I was not interested in collecting train numbers. I read railway histories instead. I had read hundreds of them before I went to university.
I was hooked on the fact that our railways, built in the 19th century, transformed our society and the nature of companies and of accounting, and even of the way in which we recognise time. Engineering was, of course, central to the building of railways, but none of that engineering could have happened without the finance, the economics, and getting the people right. And I was gripped at a very young age by that interaction between economics and social reality.
That curiosity has never left me. Fifty years later, I'm still reading about railways and economics. People ask me whether the books behind me in these videos are actually real. They are, and some of them are fifty years old.
And late last year, I began to write a series of blog posts about some of the thinkers who had influenced me. For each one, I asked a key question they posed and what challenge it represented for us now. As a result, I asked whether we are getting better or worse off as a consequence of their thinking and how we might still use it or leave it behind, and in some cases, I strongly recommend that we do just that.
That series has now become the basis of this book. The book includes some of my heroes, but the net has been cast very wide. John Maynard Keynes is, of course, there as you would expect, but so too is the philosopher John Rawls and his obvious heir, Amartya Sen. Major current thinkers like Stephanie Kelton and Steve Keen also appear, and I go back to the classics, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Karl Marx.
The story is brought up to date with thinkers like Kate Raworth, and my old friend John Christensen appears for his foundational work on tax justice.
There are villains, too. No plot would be complete without them, and I've got a good selection. Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek and James Buchanan are high up on that list.
And there are people who you would not expect to find in an economics book. Jesus of Nazareth is there, as is the physicist, Erwin Schrodinger. Holocaust survivors, Eric Fromm and Viktor Frankl, also both make an appearance. All of these people helped shape my economic thinking. As a result, the collection is eclectic, and I make no apology for that.
This book is about a fifty-year journey, and it is one I want to share. All these thinkers have shaped who I am and what I say now.
Some shaped my thinking by what they got right, others by what they got wrong, but both are valuable.
So, too is a multidisciplinary approach, and that style of thinking has genuinely enhanced my economics, and that is what this collection reflects.
Like all our other ebooks, this one is free, despite being more than 200 pages long. Just follow the link down below, and it is yours immediately as a PDF. You will be asked if you want to make a donation, but you can ignore that point, and I want to stress the issue. For me, the importance is that you get this book, that you read it, and you share it as widely as possible, and because it's a PDF, you are free to do that with whoever you want.
In that case, please go get it and have a look, and please do let me know what you think. I'd be grateful for your feedback.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

Buy me a coffee!

A few years ago I went to a talk in Bristol about the background to the decision to build the first steam transatlantic liner, Brunels Great Western. In particular why at Bristol.
There were clearly engineering issues involved but it was the economic side of it that was fascinating – Liverpool was making a lot of money from sailing packets so saw no reason to change Bristol had no links with North America so was up for some new business
There are 2 influencers in the last 25 years of my life that stand out above the others. The first is the Canadian evolutionary biologist Stuart Kauffman and his book “At Home in the Universe” The second is a guy called Richard Murphy
Thank you
I’m very much looking forward to working my way through this collection. Being 50 years behind you in reading on economics, a condensed and curated selection of authors is just what I need. Well worth a coffee.
I notice one of the comments on YT suggested that a PDF download was an old fashioned (kids these days!) mode of delivery. Personally I think it ideal as I can(have) transfer(ed) it to my Kindle to provide a bit of light reading in bed or when soaking in the spa with a glass of something dark red (which might just possibly NOT be Ribena!).
Keep up the good work.
Kit.
Interesting. I too started university in 1976 – Environmental Science. Later I took environmental economics as an option. This was something which most of my fellow students avoided! I found it very informative and ever since have carried on studying economic issues. Its been very useful in gaining an understanding of how economies work. Having a somewhat critical attitude has helped shape my views. I was always sceptical of the BoEs rationale for raising interest rates to deal with inflation and particularly annoyed by the Thatcher governments policies on the economy which resulted in high unemployment (which I was a casualty of). I have tended to follow non-mainstream economists so have accepted the MMT approach to government finances.
It is however difficult to engage with others at times as most people lack understanding of economic theory and practice and the household analogy re government finances is the one that people think is the right one! Its an ongoing struggle!!
Thank you
Hi Richard, Congratulations! When I go to download the PDF, however, it’s not there….. can you help?
It is here https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/downloads/
But none of these is your new book….
Would that those now taking decisions about railways had as well-developed an understanding of their economics. Their present luxurious state, half of their costs being met by Government subsidy, cannot last. JM
I am having the same problem.
We hag quite literally thousands of downloads yesterday, and then something broke last night. Apologies. It will be repaired asap but I have sent you a copy.
My background is in aspects of all the STEM subjects. I started on your PDF on economics by reading the chapter introductions. The first few lines of chapter 10 introduction “Economics claims the authority of science. It dresses its conclusions in mathematics, submits them to peer review, and presents its models as descriptions of reality” shows that Economics is missing something that real sciences have. These are experiments and observation to prove the Theory works in the real world and using this information to improve the Theory. It seems that the only experiments, I think the technical name is “Crashes” are not used to improve the Theory.