I noted this in the FT this morning, with interest:
The UK tax authority has opened multiple criminal investigations after probing whether large companies are wrongly paying less UK tax as a result of their cross-border financial arrangements.
HM Revenue & Customs opened a criminal investigation in connection with transfer pricing, under which businesses allocate profits between different countries, in 2018, the body told the Financial Times – the first occasion since the introduction of tighter legislation on the area six years ago. This has since grown to multiple live criminal investigations involving transfer-pricing disputes, HMRC added, although it declined to specify the exact number arguing this risked identifying the companies involved.
I have been arguing about the need to tackle transfer mispricing since 2003, when I created country-by-country reporting.
HMRC have now, of course, got that as a tool to help them make allegations in criminal cases, if appropriate. And, whilst I make it very clear that country-by-country reporting does not prove a transfer mispricing case, it can very strongly support the suggestion that there is systemic abuse from high to low tax jurisdictions both in a period and over time. In that case, I hope HMRC are using it for that purpose, because that was my intention.
And if that turns civil cases into criminal ones, that is all to the good. Only then will this abuse end, because no director wants to end up in the dock. It will only take a few to do so for the tax environment to change, quite radically.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Criminal trials could be good, provided there is enough muscle (robust understanding of the law, how companies operate and what to target) in the prosecution.
There’s a perception that the justice system is soft on white collar crime. For instance Nick Leeson has a very nice life now, probably overall a better life even counting his time in prison that he would have had had he not gambled so much of other people’s money. (There was a nice article about him in the Private Eye before the current one.)
So my question is this: even if these people are criminalised is it enough of a deterrent? Is the offer essentially you can steal £50 million but you’ll have to do a couple of years in a soft open prison if you get caught (which is unlikely)?
I think you may be over-optimistic in thinking it will change the tax environment radically. What it will do is incentivise more elaborate schemes with more layers of removal from the beneficiaries. So a bonanza for the tax adviser profession.
hopefully the bad press as a result of the trial would be enough to elicit a change in the companies behaviours?
Hi Richard
Is this similar to was the IRS are doing in the US? I note that Facebook are winding up one or more Irish companies also involved with IP and therefore transfer pricing?
Thanks
M
The pressure is the same
The move to considering criminality is what is new