Peter May has been assembling a page on the Tax Research wiki on resources on understanding money based on resources from the web:
And if there are items you think should be added, please fire away.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Richard,
As a retired U.S. engineer with an interest in macroeconomics, I’ve been following you and Peter May for some time. I’ve enjoyed your insights and writing styles and your attention to and bluntness in your comments. I’ve never commented to your blog until a couple of days ago (to your May 20 post, “What is money? An explanation”). I appreciated your patience there in letting me try to clarify my point.
My question is, with your focus being primarily UK and my knowledge being limited to the US system (but sharing an MMT view), would future comments I feel might contribute understanding be welcome? (No emotion invested here – just a practical-matter question.)
Make them in a spirit of adding to debate – even if you disagreee – and yes they would be
Make them as a point scoring exercise that is repetitive and gets ti the point of adding nothing, and no they won’t be
The rules here are really quite simple
And I and others do listen and note even if we do not agree
‘It’s the way you tell them’ that matters
Kindly add – Money – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0kcet4aPpQ
I listened to the lyrics again – and I’m not sure they add to the debate
Am I missing something?
Taxes for Revenue are Obsolete – Beardsley Ruml 1946
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/RUMLTAXES.html
He got some of that wrong, mind you…
Agreed, but it was almost 75 years ago.
Looks good – I’ll see what I can find in my system to add to it.
Thanks