The FT has reported that:
People hiding money overseas are increasingly being caught by the UK tax authority, which has sharply increased revenue from undeclared offshore assets in the past year.
In the 2018-19 financial year, HM Revenue & Customs' offshore, corporate and wealthy unit netted £560m from investigations into British taxpayers with offshore assets and income, up from £490m in 2017-18; a 14 per cent increase. The data also revealed a 72 per cent increase in tax collected since 2016-17 when £325m was raised.
As the article agrees, much of this is down to the success of automatic information exchange from tax havens. As a result of that, the tax gap has been reduced.
I have some form in this area. In June 2009 - a decade ago, almost to the day - I was told by HM Treasury officials that my idea that there could be a simple form of automatic information exchange from tax havens that would create the smoking gun to assist the recovery of funds from reluctant to declare offshore tax abusers was a non-starter and 'would not happen in my lifetime'. So I wrote a blog on the issue. And a paper. And that automatic information exchange happened, in my lifetime.
Now don't get me wrong: I am not saying I single-handedly changed this law. I did not. Along with many others I played a part though and in my case, partly by thinking outside the Treasury box. And the result has been more tax paid, in ways that the Treasury once thought impossible.
Sound familiar? A decade on I still seem to be having such arguments.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Even if your “many others” amounted to another 19 campaigners that looks like your joint efforts have gained about £3.5 million per agitating head, just in the last reported year. Congratulations, Richard – several million of them!
It was more than that
But it still comes to a lot per head
There will be no recognition, let me assure you!
Back in 2009 I think most tax practitioners would have been as sceptical about this being implemented on a global basis as your unnamed Treasury official.
I suspect the US unilaterally imposing FATCA on the world in 2010 changed attitudes considerably. That was driven by the US (understandably) losing patience with its taxpayers hiding funds in Switzerland.
Once everyone was going through the expense of sorting out FACTA reporting, just to send information to the US without getting anything back, it would be easy to see the benefit of receiving reports as well as sending them off, and so the multilateral CRS was rushed through on its coat-tails.
The US is still not reciprocating. Do as I say, not as I do.