This is the outline of the talk I gave to the American Tax Association (made up of US tax professors) in Orlando today:
Joy of Tax
American Tax Association
Orlando
26 February 2016
- The Joy of Tax
- My argument is simple
- Tax is the tool with the greatest opportunity to shape the world we want to live in
- This is a macroeconomic argument
- We now know how money works
- According to the Bank of England every text book is wrong
- We now know loans create deposits and not the other way round
- How tax works
- Suppose we got tax wrong too?
- Suppose governments don't tax and spend
- But spend and then tax?
- Let me assure you that's what they do
- How do we know?
- Over $6 trillion of QE proves it
- But in fact we've always known this - this is why we have a national debt
- And why we have any government created money - because all of that is created by government over spending not claimed back by tax
- So what does this mean?
- Tax never, ever, pays for government spending
- The primary goal for tax is to reclaim the money the government spends into the economy?
- Why? To prevent inflation. I told you this was macroeconomics
- Is that it?
- No!
- But what it means is that w have to completely re-appraise what tax is for
- The six reasons to tax
- Reclaiming the money spent by the government into the economy as far as is needed to control inflation
- Ratify the value of money
- Reorganise the economy
- Redistribute income and wealth
- Reprice market failure
- Raise representation in a democracy
- To put it another way
- Tax is not about paying for anything
- Tax, from beginning to end is all about shaping the economy in the way w want in accordance with our democratic principles
- Principles
- Adam Smith
- Equity
- Certainty
- Convenience
- Efficinecy
- But this is not 1776
- And these were largely standards for the administration of tax, not principles on which to base the tax system
- So in 2016
- Peace
- Equality
- Truth
- Simplicity
- Applying this to a real example
- Country-by-Country reporting
- An incredibly simple idea I created in 2003
- Why?
- Peace
- John Christensen and I, who were cofounders of the Tax Justice Network were sure there was a transfer pricing problem
- Developing countries were not collecting the money they were owed
- Multinationals were transfer mispricing profits to tax havens
- The consequences?
- Developing countries were not able to control their economies: the money they need to reclaim is not there to be had
- Nor is it available from the tax havens
- So there is international stress: the wrong people have the wrong money in the wrong place
- Developing countries are constrained on their spending because they have no ability to reclaim money
- And in many other countries the need to reclaim tax has been shifted from corporations / capital to wealth
- Stress!
- But more than that
- Equality
- Large and small business are not being treated the same: result a bias to the big
- And nor are countries being treated the same
- Whilst access to tax havens has been deliberately designed to creat inequality
- Faith in the integrity of the system was being undermined
- This was an issue to address if macroeconomic credibility and faith in government was to be preserved
- Truth is key then
- Regrettably some governments have not been committed to truth. Opacity has been their watchword
- I have defined them as secrecy jurisdications
- If you want to know who they are read the Tax Justice Network Financial Secrecy Index
- And some companies have not either
- Our aim when we set out as tax justice campaigners was to
- Put large companies on the front pages of newspapers
- If they used tax havens
- And if they cost developing countries money
- With the aim of forcing change from countries and companies
- And crucially we were always solution focuseed
- Automatic information exchange
- Beneficial ownership on pubic record
- And country by country reporting
- There were others, but these were key
- Country by country reporting
- A method to encourage companies to pay the right amount of tax in the right place at the right time
- Where right means that economic substance matches accounting form
- Tell us
- Third party sales
- Intra-group sales
- Number of employees
- Profit before tax
- Tax provided
- Tax paid
- Equity
- Retained reserves
- Tangible assets
- We can do the big data:
- Does your reporting match where your profits are likely to be earned
- So far the evidence is they definitely do not
- Won at the OECD as part of BEPS
- Fir tax reporting
- Now heading for public record in the EU, I suggest
- Why
- To provide a tax risk template
- For
- Tax authorities
- Investors
- Civil society
- The media
- This is about holding global companies to account locally
- And restoring equality for all - as efficient markets demand
- And what of simplicity
- Let me not forget the Holy Grail of tax
- There is no simple tax system in a modern economy
- But go back to Smith
- The job is to make sure tax is paid
- Equitably
- Certainly
- Conveniently
- Efficiently
- And that requires
- Good law
- Investment in tax authorities
- Every encouragement to transparency
- And cooperation - call it peace in our time
- We set out to change the world of tax
- In some ways that is what we are doing
- Regrettably some governments have not been committed to truth. Opacity has been their watchword
- Adam Smith
A mindmap summary of this is here: Joy of Tax Orlando 26-2-16
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
An excellent and very clear summary. I have shared it on twitter, facebook and linked to it from aspiblog.wordpress.com
Thanks
Hi Richard,
“Suppose governments don’t spend and tax” should be “Suppose governments don’t tax and spend”?
Thanks: corrected
I am almost speechless with admiration for what you are doing! Keep it up. (Oh, and this ex-Brit living in Oregon is loving iThoughts – great recommendation.)
Thanks Paul
I can’t believe you actually went and did this.
It brings a warm smile to my face.
Did you need a police escort to get out of the venue?
Did USA Immigration Control/Homeland Security actually know who you are?
What were the audiences faces telling you as you finished? I’d love to know.
A former PWC partner present at the event (250+ professors) reckoned if it had been in New Jersey I may not have got out alive
I think he was joking
And for the record, I did have problems getting in – but I was eventually offered a reason and now have a 10 year visa
As for the audience response, I am sure it was not universally positive – although the jokes went down well. But a great many favourable comments were received, books were ordered and I have been invited next year