The following letter, to which I am a signatory, is in the Guardian this morning:
One year ago, the LuxLeaks scandal revealed publicly the content of tax rulings issued by Luxembourg to more than 340 multinationals between 2002 and 2010. These secret deals from Luxembourg allowed many of these companies to slash their global tax bills. Some firms enjoyed effective tax rates of less than 1%.
This was further proof that European countries are competing with each other by offering a variety of creative tax measures, thus depriving other countries of important parts of their due tax revenues — and lowering total tax revenues across the whole of Europe. This is money that countries could have used for public services, healthcare or schools.
One year has passed and still no ambitious measures at European level have been agreed upon. Across Europe, governments are failing their citizens, who suffer from weaker public services and higher taxes on labour, consumption and income, and their SMEs, which cannot, like many multinationals, hire expensive tax firms and artificially design their businesses in order to lower their tax rates and, as a consequence, face unfair competition.
Strong and effective action is urgently needed; business as usual is not an option. The European Union should ensure that multinationals pay their taxes where they make their profits. We strongly advocate for ambitious reforms to clamp down on tax fraud, close legal loopholes, effectively sanction tax havens, fight corruption and money-laundering, and improve transparency and cross-border cooperation.
Specifically, we call on EU member states and the European commission to support the obligation for public country-by-country reporting. This measure would oblige listed companies to make public their activities and the taxes they pay in each country in which they operate, in order to allow tax authorities, investors and all stakeholders to properly assess their activities and tax strategies and to take action in case of inappropriate or illicit corporate behaviour. Such transparency requirements would not entail any negative consequence for companies' competitiveness, as highlighted in the results of the European commission's impact assessment of public country-by-country reporting for large financial institutions.
A year after the scandal of LuxLeaks, European citizens and responsible businesses cannot wait any longer for meaningful action. It is high time for member states to learn the lessons of LuxLeaks, finally put an end to multinationals' tax-dodging, and start working towards a fair system of company taxation. This is an essential precondition for finally reigniting economic growth in the EU for the benefit of both citizens and companies. The stakes could not be higher.
John McDonnell MP Shadow chancellor
Thomas Piketty Paris School of Economics
Richard Murphy City University
Glenis Willmott MEP Labour, East Midlands
Anneliese Dodds MEP Labour, South East England
Neena Gill MEP Labour, West Midlands
Seema Malhotra MP Shadow chief secretary to the Treasury
Paula Sherriff MP Labour, Dewsbury
Paul Kenny General secretary, GMB trade union
Winnie Byanyima Executive director, Oxfam International
Christine Allen Director of policy and public affairs, Christian Aid
Sorley McCaughey Head of advocacy and policy, Christian Aid Ireland
Luca Visentini General secretary, European Trade Union Congress
Jan Willem Goudriaan General secretary, European Federation of Public Service Unions
Ronen Palan City University
Ann Pettifor City University
Anastasia Nesvetailova City University
Prem Sikka Essex University
Gianni Pittella MEP President of the European parliament Socialists & Democrats group
Romano Prodi Former president of the European commission and former Italian prime minister
Josep Borrell Former president of the European parliament
Elio Di Rupo President of the Belgian Socialist party and former Belgian prime minister
Vincenzo Visco Former Italian finance minister
Jutta Urpilainen Former Finnish finance minister
Paul Magnette Minister-president of Wallonia, Belgium
Pierre-Alain Muet Member, French national assembly
Yann Galut Member, French national assembly
Jean-Paul Fitoussi Co-chair, Progressive Economy scientific board
Professor Jill Rubery Member, Progressive Economy scientific board
Professor Kate Pickett Member, Progressive Economy scientific board
Dr Irene Ring Member, Progressive Economy scientific board
Professor András Inotai Member, Progressive Economy scientific board
Professor Ilene Grabel Member, Progressive Economy scientific board
Professor Heikki Patomäki Member, Progressive Economy scientific board
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Correct me if I am wrong somewhere in this list , but it just looks like a roll call of the usual Leftie suspects.(I belong to some of the organizations mentioned) Nothing wrong with the Letter, but when is it going to be realised that tax is at heart consensual, it needs acceptance from all shades of opinion.
All change happens because people demand it
Consensus does not demand change
It preserves the status quo
Your logic ignores the process by which change happens
It was very appropriate to read your contribution next to Piketty’s on Saturday …
http://www.amazon.com/The-Joy-Tax-Richard-Murphy-ebook/dp/B00Q5TV8F6
PS: Cartoon of note:
http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/blog-post/2430169/colin-the-joy-of-cameron