The tax gap has been a big issue over the last few years. From being virtually unrecognised at the time I wrote The Missing Billions for the TUC in 2008 it is now, officially, the number one priority of H M Revenue & Customs. And this year they claim that they have succeeded in reducing it. Except they didn't: all that happened was that the VAT rate went down in the period on which they based their estimates, but as it has risen a lot since then so will the tax gap have gone up too.
Now rumour reaches me that HMRC are to have a big push to close the tax gap early in the New Year but they're so lacking in confidence that plan B for failure is already being put in place, and that's to outsource significant parts of the operations of HMRC. Rumour has it within HMRC that one of the Big 4 may get the job of collecting tax. There's a case of the fox being put in charge of the chicken run if ever I heard of one.
But the whole rumour also has an awful feel of truth about it. It fits with all the Conservatives' ideas. And it also smacks of the desperation that pervades the end of the neoliberal idea. Tax farming - the business of tax collecting for profit - has always discredited government. It's gone on for thousands of years - it's what the tax collectors in the Bible did, and just why they were hated. And it always reeks of corruption. Because that's what it is.
The trouble for them is that people know that to profit from a public right is ethically wrong. But the Tories don't understand ethics and that's why I'm not at all surprised the privatisation of HMRC is now on their agenda.
Bet let me assure them: if people don't like paying HMRC they're going to resent a part of their tax going to profit the Big 4 firms of accountants a lot, lot more.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
dosent sound great – although I suppose its a bit like debt factoring in a way.
If the collector is on a contingent fee basis, ie only get paid x% for amounts collected over Y amount it could work (Y being set at a level that HMRC would have collected as a matter of course/minimal effort anyway), so the collector actually has to work for their fee rather than sit back and process cheques as it were.
Ethics don’t ever come into your thinking?