I'm not sure I like the term Neets - which stands for "not in employment, education and training". But it's highly relevant. There are coming on for a million 16 to 24 year olds in this category now.
The Neets are important - those who are unemployed at this age are, evidence shows, likely to be harmed for life. Their earning capacity will always be impaired. Their chance of successive periods of unemployment is high. And with that many out of work its hard to imagine people do not knwo someone in this group in society - I certainly do.
We have seen mass opposition to the sale of forests. But now we need to see mass opposition to this waste of human talent. And some are protesting, and rightly so. This is in part what UK Uncut is about. As Heather Stewart said in the Observer today:
A new generation is starting to join the dots between, for example, bumper bonuses at the banks, large-scale tax avoidance by some of Britain's biggest companies, and the age of austerity being so painfully imposed on the rest of us. It is, as they quite rightly say, not fair — and Osborne's doctrine that government must "get out of the way" and let the private sector flourish will cut no ice with those queueing outside the jobcentre. They may not be as organised as the "save our forests" campaign that forced the government into an embarrassing U-turn over its plans to flog off our woodland; but they have every right to be heard.
They're right to notice this link.
It's noted again in the Observer's coverage of BP's claim for a massive tax refund - a claim made in support of its right to the free movement of capital it says - a claim to be pursued ahead of course of the right of young people to work in this country. As is again noted:
I'm delighted to have aid some part in raising these questions. This debate - on tax justice as justice for people as opposed to capital in this country - is key to the debate on the future we want.
The question it asks is what comes first - people or capital?
And it asks the question - why do some (corporations and their owners, all of them) seem able to avoid their responsibility - not just here but right around the world (see this article about Australia if in doubt)?
This is why tackling the rolling back of the corporate tax regime - whatever its apologists say - is so clearly a choice by the ConDem government - and one that is so very obviously worng.
Come April this government's contempt for Neets will become very obviously just a part of their contempt for all middle and low income people in this country. And this is a choice - a point I made on Newsnight last week in the context of the choice to reduce the burden of corporation tax whilst at the same time imposing increasing burdens on the young, poorest and middle income people of this country.
It's right to protest against this choice.
It's a choice that Cameron, through gerrymandered electoral reform wants to make permanent by seeking to deny forever the chance (he hopes) of electing anything but a Conservative government.
It's a chance we need to deny him. Fianna Fail sought to destroy Ireland for the benefit of a few. Cameron is seeking to destroy whole swathes of hope in this country for much the same rason. And we need to treat him and his governemtn and its partners with the same contempt that the Irish have now shown for Fianna Fail.
And yes, peaceful protest - peaceful mass protest if need be - is an essential part of that. Because people come before capital, and the rights of capital's owners to preserve their wealth at cost to all else.