The Tax Justice Network has blogged the continuing abuse of information exchange by Switzerland.
Carl Levin has said:
While it is good to know that 14,700 people have now disclosed previously hidden offshore bank accounts, the U.S.—Swiss Annex disclosed today, designed to compel disclosure of the names of U.S persons with Swiss accounts at UBS, is very disappointing. It complicates and muddies what should have been a straightforward agreement by UBS and the Swiss Government to disclose Swiss accounts hidden from the United States by U.S. accountholders.
UBS admitted last year that it ‘participated in a scheme to defraud the United States’ out of tax revenue. Since then, UBS has been prohibited by its government from simply turning over the names of the 52,000 U.S. clients suspected of participating in that tax evasion scheme with UBS. Instead, the tortured wording and the many limitations in this Annex shows the Swiss Government trying to preserve as much bank secrecy as it can for the future, while pushing to conceal the names of tens of thousands of suspected U.S. tax cheats. It is disappointing that the U.S. government went along.
He’s right.
So we still have still to these places.
And we will.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Cheating, eh?
This annex was agreed through negotiation by the respective agencies of two sovereign governments. If there was any “cheating” involved, why did the “cheated” party not object to the agreement?
Things may not be going the way you want, fair enough, but it is no excuse.
Richard,
I suggest you avoid blanket-smearing a people or a whole community (such as “the Swiss are cheating”).
History has taught me that extremist words can have extreme consequences and certainly do not foster international cooperation. Leave this to far-left or far-right politicians, or to fanatics (which you certainly do not consider to be).
A few days ago, you informed us of your criteria to accept comments on your blog. I would suggest you submit your own comments to the following rule : no generalization.
In the present matter, I fully agree with Edouard (unless you believe Swiss diplomats and financial experts are so much more efficient and wily than their US counterparts).
Best
Bernard