In 2009 the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development said it was going to crack down on tax havens by demanding that they open themselves to all comers who wanted information they held on tax abusers.
Then we learned that actually this meant that tax havens / secrecy jurisdictions must sign at least twelve (yes, I mean 12) of the absolutely useless tax information exchange agreements. There are, of course, about 200 tax adminsitrations in the world but 12 treaties were enough for the OECD apparently. Reconcile that if you can.
And what did the tax havens do? They promptly signed enough agreements with the most useless places they could find, or with each other. At the last count I reckoned there were 518 of these agreements. But just look at the following list of absolutely useless ones that we can be quite sure will never be used and it's easy to see why there has been no real change in the tax haven world as a result of the OECD's action. This list is almost 20% of the total such agreements:
- Faroe Islands - Uruguay
- Greenland - Uruguay
- Faroe Islands - Mauritius
- Greenland - Mauritius
- Greenland - Barbados
- Faroe Islands - Barbados
- Faroe Islands - Bahrain
- Greenland - Bahrain
- Faroe Islands - Costa Rica
- Greenland - Costa Rica
- San Marino - Vanuatu
- Faroe Islands - Macau
- Greenland - Macau
- Greenland - The Seychelles
- Faroe Islands - The Seychelles
- Faroe Islands - Liechtenstein (29 December 2010)
- Greenland - Liechtenstein
- Aruba - St. Kitts and Nevis
- Greenland - Montserrat
- Faroes Islands - Montserrat
- Faroes Islands - Liberia
- Greenland - Vanuatu
- Faroes Islands - Vanuatu
- Guernsey - San Marino
- Greenland - Marshall Islands
- Faroes Islands - Marshall Islands
- Faroes Islands - Belize
- Faroes - Monaco
- Groenland - Antigua and Barbuda
- Groenland - Dominica
- Groenland - Grenada
- Groenland - Saint Lucia
- Faroes Islands - Grenada
- Faroes Islands - Saint Lucia
- Faroes Islands - Dominica
- Faroes Islands - Antigua and Barbuda
- Aruba - Cayman Islands
- Faroes - St. Vincent and the Grenadines
- Greenland - St. Vincent and the Grenadines
- Faroes - St Kitts and Nevis
- Greenland - St Kitts and Nevis
- Greenland - Bahamas
- The Faroe Islands and Bahamas
- Greenland - Andorra
- Faroes Islands - Andorra
- Faroes Islands - Cook Islands (16 December 2009)
- Faroes Islands - Samoa (16 December 2009)
- Faroes Islands - Turks & Caicos
- Greenland - Cook Islands (16 December 2009)
- Greenland - Samoa (16 December 2009)
- Greenland - Turks & Caicos
- Faroes Islands - Anguilla
- Greenland - Anguilla
- Liechtenstein - St Kitts & Nevis
- Liechtenstein - Antigua & Barbuda
- Antigua and Barbuda - Netherlands Antilles
- Aruba - Bermuda
- Faroe Islands - Gibraltar
- Greenland - Gibraltar
- Liechtenstein - St Vincent & the Grenadines
- The Bahamas - San Marino
- Greenland - San Marino
- Monaco - Liechtenstein
- Monaco - Andorra
- Monaco - Bahamas
- Andorra - San Marino
- Andorra - Liechtenstein
- Aruba - British Virgin Islands
- Netherlands Antilles - British Virgin Islands
- Netherlands Antilles - St Kitts & Nevis
- Aruba - St Kitts & Nevis
- The Faroe Islands - Aruba
- Greenland - Aruba
- The Faroe Islands - Netherlands Antilles
- Greenland - Netherlands Antilles
- The Faroe Islands - San Marino
- San Marino - Samoa
- Aruba - St. Vincent and the Grenadine
- Monaco - San Marino
- Faroes - British Virgin Islands
- Greenland - British Virgin Islands
- Faroes - Bermuda
- Faroes - Cayman Islands
- Greenland - Bermuda
- Greenland - Cayman Islands
- Greenland - Guernsey
- Greenland - Jersey
- Faroes - Isle of Man
- Greenland - Isle of Man
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Looking down the list I wonder if the UK were to require all the prominent people and company bossed who are major tax avoiders to be in residence in Greenland between September and May, preferably the north to be eligible for such reliefs, whether this might cause them to reconsider. As an act of charity we could allow them back for the London Summer Season, at a price, of course.
The Isle of Man has signed agreements with China, Germany, France, the UK, the US, Canada, Japan and the Netherlands to name a few out of 33 agreements.
And all of them are useless
How much data has been exchanged?
That, or even the number of requests, we will never know because it is confidential information.
A question on this very subject was asked in Tynwald last month:
http://www.tynwald.org.im/business/hansard/20002020/t121016.pdf#page=55
Many thanks
Now blogged
“$67 Trillion”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-18/shadow-banking-grows-to-67-trillion-industry-regulators-say.html
Methinks its out by about ten times that amount!.
“Los Angeles Times”
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-white-house-secession-50-states-20121114,0,4408092.story
“The UK takes the largest share in Europe with €7 trillion, while the US, in comparison, has €18 trillion.”
http://euobserver.com/economic/118241
After 300 years of slavery, exploitation, and colonialism, do you think we owe small islands something when they try to establish a viable economy?
Yes – we owe them a real economy – not a corrupt one
Shadow banking seems to be undesirable for the 99%. 67 trillion is four and half times larger than than the GDP of the USA. How do we control it?
If we were to say that as the shadow banking system took place outside the remit of the Regulators, their contracts were not enforceable in courts, would ‘meltdown’ -to use the cliche- result? Or could we come through it to a more ‘real’ economy as Richard means it in his response to pwright?
I believe that making contracts unenforceable is vital to beating offshore and other related abuses
I think the approach entirely valid and fair. Why should our property law be used to support abuse that might shatter the whole concept of property?
Anyone hazard a guess why half these agreements with Faroe Islands? Seems they’re the most immoral tax avoiding bunch of fishermen I have ever seen 🙂
“There are an estimated 3.5 million children living in poverty in the UK — 1.6 million in severe poverty. This shocking figure is expected to rise by 400,000 by 2015.”
http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/resources/online-library/child-poverty-2012-it-shouldnt-happen-here
[…] wrote yesterday about the farce of the tax information exchange agreements that have been signed by many tax […]