Yesterday we published a blog entitled "Murdoch: when it comes to taxes, instead of rendering unto Caesar, Murdoch has Caesar rendering unto him."
It was based on some reporting, done in good faith, by David Cay Johnston, one of the U.S.' top
tax reporters and a Pulitzer prize winner. It was published by Reuters.
We now understand that the original story was wrong, so we have withdrawn the blog. As we understand it, this is his first retraction in a 45-year career.
PDF of article
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Comments
When commenting, please take note of this blog's comment policy, which is available here. Contravening this policy will result in comments being deleted before or after initial publication at the editor's sole discretion and without explanation being required or offered.
Surprised you didn’t spot it was wrong. He was only a reporter. You are an accountant who knows his stuff.
I’ll be honest – I did not check it – but my work on this for the Guardian in 2008 showed a rate of 15% by NI so I was surprised
Yes, I should have been more circumspect
But come on – this is a blog – not a major news organisation