The Guardian notes this morning that:
Andy Burnham has said his programme of devolution strengthens the case for a written constitution for the UK, a move that would fundamentally alter the workings of the state that have developed over centuries.
The prime minister has long believed the UK's “antiquated” political system needs a dramatic overhaul if opportunity is to be shared equally across the country.
I have long argued for the need for such a constitution. So, this is a quick summary of what I would include. I stress, this is an opening suggestion. I would refine it with more time.
1. A written constitution
- Define the powers of Parliament, government, the courts and devolved administrations.
- Protect fundamental civil, political, social and environmental rights, and the right to free speech and protest without government constraint.
- Require government to uphold democratic accountability and equality before the law.
- Remove the remaining constitutional roles of the royalty and transfer them to elected politicians.
2. Replace first-past-the-post with proportional representation
- Every vote should count.
- Parliament should reflect how people actually vote.
- End manufactured majorities.
3. Abolish the House of Lords
- End hereditary and appointed legislators.
- Replace it with a democratically legitimate second chamber representing the nations and regions of the UK, with clearly defined constitutional functions rather than a rival to the Commons.
4. Constitutionally protect devolution
- Devolved powers should not be removable by a simple Westminster majority.
- England should also have meaningful regional devolution.
5. Guarantee the right of every nation to choose its future
- Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should have a constitutional right to hold regular referendums on independence under agreed rules.
- England's constitutional position should also be explicitly defined.
6. A constitutional right to local government
- Local government should exist by constitutional right, not by permission of Parliament.
- Councils should have secure powers, responsibilities, revenue, and sources of borrowing.
7. Restore democratic control over economic policy
- Parliament should determine fiscal and monetary policy.
- The Treasury should become accountable to Parliament for delivering agreed social, economic and environmental objectives.
- Economic policy should not be constrained by self-imposed fiscal rules presented as immutable truths.
- The Bank of England should have its notional independence removed.
8. A constitutional commitment to economic justice
- Government should be required to pursue full employment.
- It should seek to reduce inequality.
- It should provide universal access to healthcare, education, housing and social security.
- Economic success should be judged by outcomes for people, not arbitrary financial targets.
9. Recognise government's monetary powers
- The constitution should acknowledge that a currency-issuing government cannot be treated as if it were a household.
- Public spending decisions should be based on the availability of real resources and inflationary limits, not myths about “running out of money.”
10. Guaranteed transparency
- A constitutional right to government information.
- Strong protections for whistleblowers.
- Open public accounts and beneficial ownership registers for all companies and trusts.
11. Reform political finance and lobbying
- Tight limits on political donations.
- Full transparency over lobbying.
- Restrictions on the revolving door between government and large corporations.
12. Protect the independence of public institutions
- An independent civil service.
- Independent courts.
- Independent electoral administration.
- Independent anti-corruption bodies.
- Public service broadcasters protected from political interference.
13. Constitutional protection for the environment
- A duty on governments to safeguard biodiversity and address climate change.
- The legal requirement to meet net-zero targets by 2050 should be constitutional.
- Recognition that future generations have interests that deserve protection.
14. A constitutional right to participation
- Constitutionally granted rights to public services, including health, education to undergraduate or equivalent level, housing, clean air and water, justice, and environmental protection.
- Stronger rights to petition Parliament.
- Easier mechanisms for public consultation on major legislation.
- The right to call for Citizens' Assemblies and to have their findings considered.
15. The right to redress
- The right to constitutional redress for a government's failure to uphold its duties must be available, with legal funding provided to petitioners.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

Buy me a coffee!

If only our politicians would breakout of their current jailhouse of thought. If only.
Very much so Richard – but there is absolutely no sign this will happen. Despite all the corruption and the majority of people being turned off politics – ‘they are all in it for themselves’ – there seems no inclination to change the current snouts in the trough system<p>
I would also add oversight and protection of political parties – which sort of don’t really exist in our current ‘constitution’. They should be proper membership associations with members having democratic power rather than as now being vehicles for factional takeovers.
Noted.
This would be transformational,
is there rights to assemble, to protest and strong mechanisms for people to hold parliament and unrepresentative power bases to account.
would love this to become a citizen manifesto and checklist to audit parties, the would fail inspection and ‘need special measures’
Do you think I have adequately covered your point?
Certain far right individuals have noticed our lack of a written constitution and believe it makes us vulnerable. I’m pretty sure some think tank or other have put proposals across the desks of Thiel and Musk and others like them. If Burnham’s thinking includes protection from this possibility then I’m all for it, but I worry who has been whispering in his ear on this subject.
Very, very good. And it has to be.
My concern with devolution is that such a system can be used by a government to divest itself of responsibilities to the regions and localities – it reminds how the Tories dealt with the NHS (Lansley was it?) and its Localism Bill which to me at least dumped responsibility on those least able to take it, and enabled Government to be less accountable whilst undertaking a policy of austerity. There is a burden of proof on Burnham and I hope that he is up to it.
Now he has to deliver something better than a crock of shit political excuses for failure.