There is an article in the FT this morning that blows apart the only known political justification for Reform, which is their claim to be able to cut the size of government by eliminating waste, a competence they have suggested no one else possesses.
The article notes:
Senior councillors at Kent county council have admitted their Elon Musk-inspired cost-cutting drive has not found any significant waste to cut, despite bombastic claims made by senior figures in Reform UK.
It continues:
Paul Chamberlain, one of the Reform UK cabinet members in charge of the so-called Department of Local Government Efficiency [Dolge], told the FT they had taken control nine months ago expecting to find vast amounts of waste but that had not materialised.
“We made some assumptions that we would come in here and find some of the craziness that [Elon Musk's cost-cutting vehicle] Doge found in America . . . and that was wrong, we didn't find any of that,” Chamberlain said.
As the FT notes
His admission calls into question the rationale for Reform's Dolge by Nigel Farage and the rightwing populist party's former chair Zia Yusuf, who have both argued there is vast waste and “fraud” in local government.
There is, beyond a shadow of doubt, waste and fraud in local government. Most human systems are prone to both. But the reality is that Reform's claims were always ridiculous.
Local authorities have been cut back to the bone by more than a decade of cuts.
If there was waste to eliminate, it has almost all been eliminated, and what remains will largely be due to new initiatives that are not yet bedded in. As for fraud, the systems to find it in local government are now pretty good. It is in the private sector's relations with the government where fraud is rampant: 40% of all corporate tax owed by small businesses goes unpaid.
So what is left of the reason for Reform and its absurd economic claims? Nothing at all, of course. They were always hollow, and now they have been hollowed out.
There is just racism left to justify its existence in that case, as well as all the other forms of discrimination it can bring to the table with it. That is all Reform is about now, and I think people are beginning to realise that.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Buy me a coffee!
Agree. Does the MSM cover any of this – no. Perhaps it has a death wish to see Fart-rage & Deform elected?
Meanwhile, while the UK MSM and what passes for politics plays tiddly-winks with fart-rage/Deform/Mandelson, there is this: https://www.youtube.com/live/95AyrNmoEYg
There has been a coup-d’etat in China & war/invasion ref Taiwan is coming – which will start a global financial crash. The letter referred to sounds right on the number by the way.
Apologies if this is a bit off-topic for this blog – but a number of blog posts have covered the financial crash.
A village idiot could see that UK politics as-is (& for 45++ years) is unfit for purpose & needs drastic reform. Meanwhile, a typhoon in the east gathers.
(& let’s not forget – there is a lunatic at the helm in the Trump House – & I wonder how the purchase of physical gold has been developing – given the above).
“..,assumptions that we would come in here and find some of the craziness that [Elon Musk’s cost-cutting vehicle] Doge found in America . . . ”
also worth noting that DOGE did nothing of the kind anyway. They just raided and looted their pet bete noirs. They wielded a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
And more importantly grabbed masses of data….
The Reform Councillors in my LA came in full of zeal and then sort of petered out as reality sunk in. But they continue to harp on about immigration of course. If you also consider that they seem to have plenty of money behind them, you still cannot rule them out.
The reality is that local government has been cut far beyond the point where efficiency savings are possible. After more than a decade of shrinking grants and rising demand, most councils now spend the bulk of their budgets on statutory duties like adult social care, children’s services and homelessness, leaving little for the everyday services people expect and need. What is being lost is not frills but the basic fabric of community life.
The evidence is visible everywhere. Councils are closing libraries, youth centres and day centres for the elderly; potholes go unrepaired for months; planning and building control teams are so thin that developments stall; home-care visits are reduced to ten-minute slots; special-needs transport is rationed. Several authorities have issued effective bankruptcy notices, selling assets simply to keep social care running. Residents experience this as missed bin collections, parks left unmanaged, and vulnerable neighbours waiting months for assessments.
To have suggested there remains a large reservoir of waste to cut is, forgive me, utter bollocks. Services are failing not because councils are profligate, but because the funding base has been dismantled.
Thanks
Thank you, Richard.
Mrs Smithers, aka mum, oversees local government expenditure in the Thames valley and suggests cutting waste by scrapping outsourcing and rebuilding local authority expertise and capability and cutting senior manager salaries. For example, one home county CEO works largely from home in Yorkshire and is paid twice what the PM earns. Other examples include most of the fees paid for care go to investment firm intermediaries and investment firm owned medical practices charging hundreds of pounds for assessments that cost £50 before covid.
One home county refuses to build schools in the county town and spends millions annually on ferrying children to and fro schools an hour away by private sector transport.
One hopes PSR, in particular, pipes up.
Thanks
So as not to disappoint………….The Colonel’s mum is spot on. My LA is now all about contracting out having hollowed out any internal capacity to do ‘owt about anything. Contracting is a long process, it also gets mixed results, the team I work with having followed the LA’s procurement rules (schedules of services etc) to the dot, but do nothing but moan about who they have got. In my better world, the best contractors would be earning the same money in the public sector – they are worth it.
We have heads of service living in Liverpool and the far north west of Scotland and elsewhere who seem to have no time to go and look at what they are managing. Local government is still in the grip of the centrifugal forces of Nicholas Ridley – it / we in it are being forced further apart. It’s more like working with a bunch of consultants these days.
And as nature abhors a vacuum, expect business and the markets to fill the voids. And my LA is actually not a bad one, but it will be absorbed into a combined authority (bribed to do so by this government with a few extra quid) and then we’ll see won’t we?
Thanks
Depressing.
Private companies charge councils a quarter of a million per child, per year, for children in carehomes. They actively seek out children to fill their homes, sometimes moving them from one region to another. Cut that, and you are cutting waste, and more importantly, cruelty.
Also I know of all the work and huge successes that John Seddon’s Vanguard Consulting have achieved in eliminating waste in many LAs, in the NHS and in private corporations using their Vanguard Methodology based on the Toyota Production System. And the methodology focuses on eliminating failure demand – the failure to do the right thing for the customer – from the end-to-end flow of the work, and it’s not about IT or AI, far from it!
This approach Andy is spot on. The Housing Organisation I worked for made huge strides in improving Services while reducing costs by focusing on the Purpose of each Service. While giving Tenants the Service they really wanted. We even ended up doing virtually all repairs the same day and cheaper. Sadly so many Public Services are so wedded to Managerialism they won’t change.
Reform are promising more austerity to repair the damage caused by… austerity.
And rational people appear to be persuaded that this is a sensible way to proceed. As if the way to repair a broken leg was to break the other one. You couldn’t invent this nonsense.
Austerity either results in reduced services or it doesn’t. It provably does. The only challenge to my logic is the possibility that there are a large number of irrational people in UK who believe in what is demonstrably false.
Or, indeed, they believe more in the other great Reform lie, that humans are lesser people when they are not white English men. We have another word to describe that…racist.
Or, perhaps they believe that joining up in spirit with fascists will empower them in some way. It won’t.
Apologies for repeating myself from the Mandelson post earlier, but I think it needs to be reiterated. Steve Bannon is all over the Epstein Files, and Bannon claims to have been a key adviser to Farage in the run-up to the Brexit vote. It can be assumed they are still connected. Bannon and Epstein wanted the same thing, laid out in an email from Epstein to Peter Thiel, an outspoken opponent of democracy, and whose tendrils are all through our politics and economy.
“Brexit, just the beginning,” Wrote Epstein. He then went on to say what he was trying to accomplish. “Return to tribalism,” he wrote. “Counter to globalization. Amazing new alliances. You and I both agreed zero interest rates were too high, and as I said in your office. Finding things on their way to collapse was much easier than finding the next bargain.”
Reform, and Farage are conspicuous in their silence on Epstein and Trump’s naming in the Files. Farage has documented ties with Bannon, a man closely associated with Epstein. Bannon and Epstein were aligned as they wanted the same thing, and therefore, we can assume they align with Farage. Reform is part of a wider far-right network, a loosely connected alliance of converging interests. Some Reform supporters may not care about the Far Right connections, many won’t care about the connections to financial deregulation and crypto, although they should. What I hope they would all care about is the links to anti-democratic forces, particularly as they would be voting for Reform democratically. Most of all, I would hope that the connection to a child sex trafficking ring and the blind eye they are willing to turn to it due to those links would put people off Reform completely. Unfortunately, my faith in some people diminishes by the day. The media aren’t covering it in the same way they would other scandals, and although some information is getting out, only a few sources are putting all the pieces together.
I shared your post with one of the editors at The National and suggested they follow up with this story as it could well help see off Reform in Scotland.
I’ll think about rejigging it for next week.
Thank you to PSR.
please forgive me, but the talk on this or that political party, is almost irrelevant. As it was so eloquently put by Mr Galloway “two cheeks of the same ****” we have more cheeks now!.
the primary issue is that the money supply is in the hands of an unaccountable Central Bank, they are currently deciding on our economic and social prospects.
Government (regardless of who is voted in or not) is entirely ineffectual. We need to get control of the money supply and put it to productive use as opposed to giving it to elites to inflate assets and shares via speculative purchases.
the UK needs to take back control of the money supply and channel it to productive use e.g. put development teams in every local authority and building homes, reduce unemployment, stimulate the local economiesa,solve a severe housing crisis. there are more than enough resource to accomplish this. UK nreeds to be investing in its productive capacity.
The Bank of England is about as independent of the government as my left leg is of me, and I can assure you it is connected and fully functioning. The BoE knows that the Chancellor can always over-rule its actions so it aways does what the Chancellor wants, and the money supply is controlled by Budgets, whilst QE and QT both need Treasury approval.
I would end BoE indepdnence and the sham of this arrangement, but your claims are dramatically overstated.
Thanks Richard appreciated. certainly connected like your left leg. they are also “independent” in control of money supply, quantitative easing, setting interest rates (price of money) with little to no accountability
You are wrong. Please don’t waste my time when I have taken a great deal of effort to work out the truth.
National and local government are clear different things. Plus councils don’t run economic policy they only deliver services.
With respect, they should have shown that understanding and not made false caims in that case. But they made them. I suggest you are the person making the error here, after Reform.