When I first began working on tax havens in the early years of this century it quickly became very clear that there was no precise definition of what a tax haven might be, and little chance of agreeing on one. The reason was simple: there were too many varieties of tax haven for one definition to cover all that they might do.
However, as I explain in this video, there was one characteristic that all the places that might have been called a tax haven seemed to have in common, and that was secrecy. What I realised was that without secrecy to hide their activities from scrutiny most of those using the paces usually called tax havens would not undertake activity there.
So, adapting the term secrecy jurisdiction that I had first heard used by the late US Senator Carl Levin, I changed the focus of attention when seeking to define these places away from tax and towards the secrecy that they almost always provide. The result was my definition of a secrecy jurisdiction, which has underpinned much of the progress on tackling these places since I first offered it in 2009.
I define secrecy jurisdictions as places that intentionally create regulation for the primary benefit and use of those not resident in their geographical domain with that regulation being designed to undermine the legislation or regulation of another jurisdiction and with the secrecy jurisdictions also creating a deliberate, legally backed veil of secrecy that ensures that those from outside the jurisdiction making use of its regulation cannot be identified to be doing so.
I explore this issue in this video.
The paper in which I redefined tax havens as secrecy jurisdictions is here.
This is the first in a series of five videos on the theme of tax havens.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
This is the EU list of tax havens – they use a different name admittedly like yourself
https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/common-eu-list-third-country-jurisdictions-tax-purposes_en
The list of countries removed from the grey list on 12th March 2019 is interesting – there are a great many territories there that are not considered tax havens by the EU now.
Whose is the better set of criteria I wonder?
The EU list is absurd
For a start EU tax havens could not appear on the list
In that case it was not worth the paper it was written on and all serious commentators know that
You don’t
But I think your time trolling here is up anyway
[…] this, the second in a series of five videos on tax havens, I look at what tax havens are now used […]
[…] the first three videos in this series on tax havens I explored why tax havens should really be called secrecy jurisdictions, what tax havens are used for now and how they try to undermine the regulation of other […]
[…] the first four videos in this series on tax havens I have explored how they work, what they abuse, and why that abuse should worry anyone who is […]
[…] the first four videos in this series on tax havens I have explored how they work, what they abuse, and why that abuse should worry anyone who is […]