Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Tax Research UK Blog is written by Richard Murphy unless otherwise stated and published by Tax Research LLP under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Design by Andy Moyle
I truly hope that this is a bad joke?
You mean you think FPTP is a bad joke?
I’d agree
Not really. The graphic is actually a representation of where people want to go, and not what they want to drink.
Whereas with a PR system, every 3rd round (or so) has to be coffees rather than beers!
But which pub?
Really av is even more undemocratic than fttp and more expensive.
According to the polls the electorate is not too interested.
If your big selling point is that it will help exclude the conservatives, see baby ed milliband,
All you are wanting is inertia and lack of change.
It is change that keeps us democratic. And fttp does that.
I see the point trying to be made, but the graph gives no indication of what the voters second preference would be.
Taking into account that in AV a second preference wouldn’t have to be provided, given the data from this graph, the winner would be the coffee shop in either AV or FPTP.
To sum up, this fails
Jeremy you are wrong- coffee would not win under AV. Look all those that voted pub A are most likely going to have B as their second option. Just like the lib dem voters who would most defiantly not have wanted their vote to go to labour rather labour, green or indie.