Just when Companies House needs all the money it can get to impose regulations – it cuts its fees

Posted on

One of the most obvious arguments I make in 500,000 missing people: £16 billion of lost tax is that Companies House is failing to regulate the companies that it is entrusted to ensure comply with the law in the UK, and that it does so because it has insufficient resources to do the job.

Worse, it not only has insufficient resources - but is sacking about a quarter of its staff when it very obviously needs many more to make sure companies comply with the law - which right now they do not, in their hundreds of thousands.

It's a touch ironic that on the very day I say this Companies House announces that rather than raise the cash it needs it's going to cut its fees.

Reducing the annual return fee for a company from £15 to £14 is a meaningless gesture. It makes no difference at all to the regulatory burden on business. This is gesture politics. Losing £2.5 million that should be used to enforce the law - meaning that in the economy as a whole we lose £16 billion - is a very big deal.

These changes represent one thing - the mistaken belief that government is 'on the back of business' and must get off it. This drives all polecat at the Department if Business, Innovation and Skills. The trouble is - it's wrong. Business badly needs a level playing field. BIS is not delivering that because it's assisting half a million companies a year not pay tax whilst those they compete with do. It really is time they got their act together. Reducing the income of Companies House can only make things worse.

Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here: