There’s an excellent article by Jill Segger under the above title in Ekklesia. I offer this sample and recommend the rest:
During my adult life, there has been virtually no national moral conversation about progressive taxation. Progressive people have permitted their approach to be dictated entirely by the ideological Right. In default of a socially responsible voice making the case for income tax, it is now almost universally perceived as a burden to be avoided or evaded. Many libertarians delight in presenting it as something approaching an insult to personal liberty. An increasingly consumerist and individualist culture which tends towards indignation at anything it finds personally inconvenient, provides a receptive audience.
Because Labour has lacked the moral courage to challenge such a distorted and solipsistic view, it has always been on the back foot in responding to the Tory policy of tax cutting. Instead of presenting an unashamedly different and ethical approach to the funding of the services of a civilised democracy, it has squirmed and equivocated to its own detriment and, worse, to that of the moral vision of successive generations of tax payers. There are now two post-war generations who no longer understand income tax as being the subscription fee to the decent society.
As the author concludes:
Osborne has said “ I did not come into politics to raise taxes. I came into politics to do the best for the country”. That he depicts these as mutually exclusive indicates the moral impoverishment of our politics.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
“ I did not come into politics to raise taxes. I came into politics to do the best for the country”: you endorse Segger’s suggestion that these were presented as mutually exclusive choices. I’m not so sure. Another interpretation is that he’d rather not raise taxes, but that in this instance raising taxes was the best thing for the country. Of course, whether VAT was the right tax to increase is a different question.
“That he depicts these as mutually exclusive indicates the moral impoverishment of our politics.”
On the contrary. It is a sign of progress in the nation’s thinking. The new progressives are those who look forward with new ideas on the morally correct relationship between people and the state. The left (still claiming to own the word “progressive” like fusty old colonels claiming to own the word “gay”) are those who look backwards to the decades of failed ideas.
Agreed that the word “progressive” is increasingly useless. But these failed ideas? What are they,pray? Healthcare for all? Education for all? A society in which the elderly and infirm are not destitute? Where children aren’t sent up chimneys?