It’s a long time before debate on a tax general anti-avoidance principle is going to be over

Posted on

Catherine McKinnell MP spoke at the ICAEW New Era event last evening and added much of value.

What is very clear is that she has no intention of giving David Gauke an easy ride. One issue she clearly is going to run with is his proposal for a a General Anti-Abuse Rule for tax - which is his pale, watered down version of Graham Aaranson's already weak proposal for a general anti-avoidance rule. I described Gauke's suggestion as "wallpaper" at the meeting.

McKinnell made clear she wants something much stronger. That's why Michael Meacher's General Anti-Tax Avoidance Principle Bill fits the brief so well. It does what Gauke says he wants and what his Bill will never do. Sure, I'm biased: I wrote Michael's Bill, but this one is going to run  and run.


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

  • Richard Murphy

    Read more about me

  • Support This Site

    If you like what I do please support me on Ko-fi using credit or debit card or PayPal

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Taxing wealth report 2024

  • Newsletter signup

    Get a daily email of my blog posts.

    Please wait...

    Thank you for sign up!

  • Podcast

  • Follow me

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    @RichardJMurphy

    BlueSky

    @richardjmurphy.bsky.social