Floyd Norris, the chief financial correspondent of The New York Times and The International Herald Tribune, covers the world of finance and economics.
He wrote about a new report on taxes supposedly paid by US corporations for the New York Times on Friday.
It was prepared by PWC using their utterly misleading Total Tax Contribution method which provides no meaningful data but does deliver vast amounts of duff misinformnation for Fox News at considerably greater cost then country-by-country reporting would possibly impose.
These are the largest and most successful companies in the country – the Roundtable says that its members collectively have $6 trillion in revenues and 13 million employees. Is there not one member of the Roundtable that finds it objectionable to present something so blatantly misleading as this study?
He's right to do so.
This is the accounting profession at its worst - deliberately seeking to pass tax liability from the richest and most able to pay onto the poorest in Amercia and elsewhere.
PWC should be ashamed of themselves. But it seems they are not.
Perhaps it's average partners remuneration in the UK of well over half a million each that makes them so thick skinned.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
A bit more depth would be good, rather than just a quote.
What is the Total Tax Contribution method? Why is it so flawed and what would be a better measure?
Try searching Tax Research PWC Total Tax and you’ll find a lot
I can’t do Google’s job all day
Sorry
1. I’m surprised UK partners incomes are so low in the UK, considering how much higher they are in North America (honestly!)
2. The question “do PWC feel no shame” is a tautology. We both know accountants feel no shame because they have no feelings! (hat tip to monty python).