As Jonathan Freedland said in the Guardian this morning:
A quick look at the figures confirms that, until the crash hit in September 2008, the levels of red ink were manageably low. The budget of 2007 estimated Britain's structural deficit — that chunk of the debt that won't be mopped up by growth — at 3% of gross domestic product. At the time, the revered Institute for Fiscal Studies accepted that two-thirds of that sum comprised borrowing for investment, leaving a black hole of just 1% of GDP. If the structural deficit today has rocketed close to 8%, all that proves is that most of it was racked up dealing with the banking crisis and subsequent slump — with only a fraction the result of supposed Labour profligacy. After all, even the Tories would have had to pay out unemployment benefit.
This is the reality: Labour managed the economy well until the bankers broke its back.
But that was banker’s fault not Labour.
Osborne’s lie is that this was Labour’s fault.
That is a lie.
He knows it is a lie.
And he trades on that lie.
But he can’t build a solution based on that lie. And that’s why his solution will not work. He’s tackling the wrong problem with the wrong prescription at the wrong time.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here: