The Guardian is launching a series of articles on Monday on the Tax Gap. As Polly Toynbee says in her article in the Guardian today:
On Monday the Guardian reports on its investigation which reveals corporate tax avoidance on a gargantuan scale. Respectable FTSE 100 companies, household brands that are cornerstones of Britishness, have for years deprived British citizens of potentially billions - all done legally by battalions of super-accountants and lawyers.
As company wealth ballooned during the boom, the money going into Treasury coffers should have grown proportionately. But between 2000 and 2007 the proportion of tax paid by top companies fell. Where did it go? The very clever people who devised fiendish debt devices that blew up the banks also applied their brains to byzantine new tax avoidance strategies.
Of course, this builds on two things. The first is the Tesco / Guardian debacle of a year ago. The Guardian got a part of their story wrong and Tesco sued. They also, undeniably, and as I pointed out very strongly on this blog, got the story absolutely right: Tesco were deliberate tax avoiders. Thankfully Private Eye joined the debate and Tesco won a very hollow victory against the Guardian as a consequence.
Second, at the same time as the Guardian were talking about Tesco the TUC published my report 'The Missing Billions'. It's that report that let's Polly say with conviction that the corporate tax rate of FTSE companies has fallen persistently this decade. But what is clear is that the Guardian was bloodied by the Tesco fight, but not bowed:
Delving into the truth of company taxes has taken the Guardian team months of digging, talking to whistle-blowers, and following the knotted strings that lead through a labyrinth of subsidiaries in secretive tax havens.
And as she says:
Public companies are anything but public about tax. Annual accounts are opaque, not obliged to spell out how much tax was paid where, or the tax-advantageous deals between their subsidiaries.
But this we know: a third of FTSE 100 companies paid no tax in 2005-2006, and another third paid a minute proportion of their operating profits. Thanks to avoidance, HMRC says 12 of the UK's largest firms "extinguished all liabilities in 2005-2006".
Of course, as the Guardian's lawyers point out, everything unearthed that looks to the naked eye like a breathtaking affront to ordinary PAYE payers is legal. But that does note mean that there is nothing that can be done about this abuse. All that is required to effect change is imagination and political will. Polly's prescription is clear:
The EU and the US united could effectively shut down havens and force them to reveal secretive accounts: if they refused to comply, all banking connections could be cut.
There should be a common international tax regime with no loopholes, while still letting each country set its own rates.
Start with transparency: make all companies consolidate their accounts to report which countries their profits arise from, where taxes are paid, and the precise dealings between subsidiaries.
All are of course prescriptions readers of this blog will be familiar with. The accounting reform was originally authored by me.
But she agrees with me: this will require political will. She argues:
[C]ulture change starts with words and outrage, with naming and shaming, withdrawing peerages and knighthoods, refusing honours to any with dubious tax histories. [But i]nstead, governments woo business regardless of tax behaviour. Downing Street is the ever open ear, quaking at company threats to relocate.
And all the while those companies say they are committed to corporate social responsibility. But as Polly says:
The way to prove they are the "good corporate citizen" they claim to be is by paying the modest 28% that is the starting rate for all companies.
Maybe culture change won't happen until we get out there with saucepans to rattle and bang some shame into those inside corporate headquarters.
Now there's an idea.
Read the rest of the reports as they roll out over the coming fortnight.
Disclosure: I have advised the Guardian on tax related issues
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Richard,
Is it safe to say that the tax avoidance machinations of the Guardian Media Group will not be covered in the series of articles?
Georges
I have no idea – I’m not the editor of the Guardian
But let’s also be clear: there’s no evidence they did avoid tax
See http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/07/30/the-guardians-accounts/
Richard
Richard,
One can guess by the laconic answer that there is no great thirst to delve into either the objectivity of the Guardian’s reporting or their accounts.
The fact is the Guardian used an off-shore vehicle to help their partners in the EMAP deal avoid UK tax, at the very least. All perfectly legal and good for them. Are these very same off-shore vehicles only the domain of the favoured far-left in conducting business?
Why was GMG’s effective tax rate below 5%? Is this “fair“?
Maybe we would know more about the GMG/EMAP off-shore vehicle if there was more transparency. As the Guardian itself reported:
The structure is complex and the financial information made publicly available about the new companies remains limited.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/may/03/1
In case anyone is wondering, yes that is a whiff of hypocrisy in the air.
Georges
Georges
I’ve answered the tax rate point
And the EMAP deal was in my opinion unwise
I’m not defending it
But at least they let their journalists criticise it
That’s openness and transparency of a sort
But I agree, not enough
Richard
Richard,
I think it best as well for the GMG/Guardian to set an example and prove they are the “good corporate citizen” they claim to be by paying the modest 28% rate of tax.
Will any of this be covered in the Guardian series?
😆
Georges
Georges
Ask them!
Richard
It hardly matters. Nobody reads the Guardian.
It is good to see a bit of investigative journalism going on regarding corporate taxation, I’ll be buying the Guardian specially to see if the stories are as accurate as the Guardian’s lawyers hope they are.
It is a bit of a shame that Google Ads brought up the following two adverts at the bottom of the story on the Guardian website though…
Self Emp. Earning £60K+?
New taxation loophole allows you to take home 82% of your gross income.
http://www.taxfriend.co.uk/?a=108uop
92% take home pay
U get 90% – 92% after tax & costs IR35/MSC approved by Tax Counsel
http://www.taxatak.co.uk