Sometimes something in the news seems so significant, just for its own sake, that because it does not obviously have relevance here, it is worth noting.
That is true of the overnight news from the USA that Scott Colom, a Democrat, had beaten the Republican incumbent in the Mississippi election to represent that state in the US Senate, by the smallest of margins.
He is the first Black senator to represent this state for 150 years.
He has overturned a long history of Republican senators representing the state.
Unsurprisingly, the New York Times reported street celebrations when the result was finally called, after a ballot-counting process so tight it was not concluded until nearly a week after most others were settled.
The Democrat lead in the Senate is now extended. I stress, this does not guarantee change. I have already discussed that here, but what this does show is that the USA has rejected the corruption, straightforward evil, and neo-fascist politics of the Trump era, and people have been willing to turn out to make clear that Trump's toxic form of politics must be consigned to history.
The question is whether people elsewhere will take note, heed the lesson, and stay clear of people like Le Pen in France and Reform in the UK. Only time will tell.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Buy me a coffee!
There was a similar shift in US Politics in the 60’s when the Southern states who never voted republican as a result of the Civil War were targeted by the Republican Party who then became the dominant force in the area and displacing the generally not very nices ‘Southern Democrats’
Prior to that US Politics was as much as anything a ‘North/South’ not ‘Republican/Democrat’ split
The Democrats still cling to Neoliberalism, broadly speaking. For as long as that’s the case, fascism won’t be far away. Some Democrats want change, and the number is growing. Now is the time for them to make their move.
Agreed.
That is my fear
You don’t beat fascism by voting it out. Hitler lost a vote 8 months before seizing power, and voting continued in some occupied territories. The Americans have made a good start though, by showing they don’t accept the Republican shift to the far right, but I fear a lot of the vote was economic. Gas prices and all that. America is one of the few countries to have avoided violent revolution through political change however, between the 1920s to the 1940s. Perhaps they can do it again.
What concerned me at the time was that eleven Democrats failed to turn up for the Impeachment vote on Hegseth. So why bother voting for their party? I believe the explanation is that it was only a procedural vote, and could have been overturned by a still G.O.P controlled Congress in the future. Apparently the Democrats don’t take control until the third of January, 2027. That being said, their non-appearance gave Trump. and his cabal, the opportunity to take to the airwaves to gloat over their absence, and in my country, Scotland, as we are only too well aware, that perception sometimes counts for more than facts.
As far as the UK is concerned, I think we are very much at the stage of knowing what we don’t want, being angry at lies, impatient at the lack of progress and, more recently, realising that fascist populism is a nasty fraud.
So, anti austerity, anti genocide, anti Trump, anti Fa***e, but still under the spell of the household analogy and TINA.
TINA however, is in trouble here in the UK. Rumours are circulating that she is not all she seems. Some who unequivocally supported her are beginning to question TINA’s credentials, while others double down to protect their own reputations, and like AIPAC in the US, will spend huge sums (unsuccessfully) to prop her up, but with “Burnhamisms” to remove the appearance of wrinkes.
Burnham recognises the popular anger, but he is a TINA supporter. So much so, that he has no alternative plan, just soundbites and the promise of imaginary jam in a few years.
Today the Guardian calls for a rejection of tired stereotypes when Milburn and Timms publish their reports on NEETS & PIP.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/11/the-guardian-view-on-welfare-reform-time-to-retire-lazy-myths-and-stereotypes
But as early as the 2nd paragraph, TINA makes her appearance, stifling the imagination- “There are rival demands on the state’s resources” – and TINA dominates the rest of the article.
That is why TIARA is so important, and why the work being done here is so important.
There is a political vacuum out there, because people are rejecting TINA. But TIARA needs promoters, activists, exposure, and above all, meaningful solution-based, easily accessible content.
AIPAC & Musk poured millions into TINA’s US mid-term campaign, and FAILED.
The same is happening here, but TINA is weakening despite all the foreign money. The hard work is getting exposure for TIARA – content, exposure, activism, so peope on omnibuses talk about her. KUTGW!
Much to agree with
Victor Orbán:s brother arrested for human trafficking. This is too good to be true! Makes you wonder what Nigel Farage may really be up to!
“The substance of the suspicion is that Áron Orbán, his partner, and two associates provided assistance to at least one hundred Vietnamese nationals in illegally crossing the state border on a commercial basis and for financial gain from 2022 onwards. Members of the group assisted in obtaining visas at Hungarian diplomatic missions abroad, for which they charged a recruitment fee per person. The alleged perpetrators shared the proceeds among themselves. In some of the visa applications, short-term training in Hungary was listed as the purpose of entry, though the majority of those involved did not participate in any such training.”
Wow
What is the source of that?
This is heartening news – especially from the crucible of Neo-liberalism that is Mississippi (Neo-liberalism is just a modern iteration of confederate southern America where if you ain’t rich you are merely a slave/chattel for the rich).
It will be interesting to see the how the modern Republican slavers down there react.
Much to agree with