One of the strangest by-elections in modern British history is about to take place. Nigel Farage has resigned as MP for Clacton to force a by-election that he fully expects to win. But instead of facing Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats or the Greens, he faces something very different.
His only likely serious opponent is Count Binface.
At first sight, that sounds ridiculous. My argument in this video is that the humour is exactly the point.
In this video, I explain why the mainstream political parties have refused to contest this election, why Farage remains under investigation by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, and why his political gamble may well backfire, even if he wins.
More importantly, I argue that Count Binface represents something much larger than a novelty candidate. Satire has become one of the few effective ways of challenging populist politics. When conventional opposition fails, ridicule can expose truths that serious politicians seem unwilling to confront.
This is therefore not really a video about a man in a dustbin. It is about the failure of Britain's political system to provide a convincing alternative to forty years of neoliberal politics. It is about political alienation, the weakness of the mainstream parties, and why many voters are looking for a completely different politics based on care rather than grievance.
So, is Count Binface merely a joke—or is he exposing a crisis at the heart of British democracy?
This is the audio version:
The Debate Ammunition for this video is available here.
This is the transcript:
On 6th August in the seaside town of Clacton-on-Sea, in Essex, in England, one of the most powerful populist politicians in Europe will stand for reelection as an MP in the UK's Parliament. His most prominent opponent is very likely to be a man in a dustbin. That sentence is not a joke. It is the literal state of British democracy this summer.
Nigel Farage has forced a by-election he expects to win. He may not. This matters. A Bin is taking on rubbish politics, and I want to talk about it.
The fact that all of this is funny is precisely the point.
Farage thought he was being so clever by resigning from Parliament. He already looks like a fool. The populist misread the room. Every major political party in the UK has refused to stand against Farage in this by-election, which he has created in his own constituency with the goal of being reelected to a seat he already held.
He now faces a satirical candidate of national prominence who has stood in many by-elections and general elections before. He has even stood to be Mayor of London. Count Binface has become the sole and very visible opposition to Farage in a way that is capturing the political and popular imagination of the country. That says something important about British politics, though. It also tells us something about democracy itself.
But let's start with the facts, because they matter.
Farage resigned whilst under investigation by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner of the House of Commons. The investigation concerns undeclared donations and other benefits that he has received both during the time that he has been in Parliament and in the year before he was elected.
He calls this election that he has now called ‘a people versus the establishment election' because he says he's being picked upon by that political establishment and by the media in a way that is unprecedented and he wants the people of Clacton to put two fingers up to that establishment and that media and return him to Parliament, where he hopes the investigation will be over. But whilst his resignation did pause the current investigation into his affairs, if he returns to Parliament, as is possible, but not certain, it will be resumed. As a consequence, this move looks much less like an appeal to democracy than a political manoeuvre or stunt in the vain hope of saving his skin by trying to avoid another by-election, which most commentators now think will be the inevitable outcome if he wins this one.
Meanwhile, Labour, the Conservatives, and the Liberal Democrats, plus the Greens, have all refused to stand in this by-election, which Farage called, calling it a political stunt they do not wish to take part in, saying they will not legitimise the way in which he is disregarding the proper processes of Parliament. Now that appears to be reasonable. But it does leave a remarkable gap on the ballot paper in Clacton-on-Sea. And into that gap has stepped Count Binface.
A comedian, otherwise known as Jon Harvey, has become the principal challenger to one of Europe's leading populists, and that says a great deal.
Partly that's because Count Binface is much more than a joke candidate. His absurd policies are both deliberate and astute political satire. Every joke he makes points towards a serious political failure.
His demand that there be a price cap of 99p on the price of a 99 flake is about the cost of living.
His demand that Thames Water executives be made to swim in the River Thames is about the failure of privatisation.
His suggestion in his manifesto that he will build a single social housing unit in Clacton is about the failure of most of politics to supply any.
Satire has become a way of exposing political truth. And that means this is not really a story about a man in a bin, important as his character is. It is about widespread political alienation.
Trust in Westminster has fallen dramatically; we know that. Many voters believe politics has become a closed game. This by-election reinforces that impression. Farage calling it is just an exercise in political power for somebody who's in the privileged elite, whatever he might claim.
But Count Binface is giving people another way to express their frustration, and this might mean that this whole process could severely backfire on Nigel Farage.
But why Count Binface and why now? That's because Britain lacks a convincing political counter-narrative right now. Hard-right populism has shaped much of political debate in this country. The mainstream parties have struggled to answer it. And politics has become cautious and managerial over the last 40 years of neoliberal rule. And few politicians are challenging the grievances that so many people in this country have very directly. Binface has jumped into that empty space, and he has occupied it. That matters because he's done so with a massively effective weapon.
Mockery is one of the few weapons populists can't easily answer. You can argue against an opponent, and Farage is good at that. You can attack an opponent, and that's what Farage does all the time. But it is very much harder to defeat a joke. A one-liner does not allow a response. Binface is turning Farage's own political theatre against him. Satire is changing the rules of this contest. Binface is puncturing the normal political script.
Conventional interviews depend upon accepted rituals, played out between the interviewer and the politician. And we see this time and again, which is why so many people are fed up with the media as well. Satire breaks those conventions. Farage cannot easily dismiss Binface. He cannot attack him without looking defensive. He cannot ignore him because Binface is standing against him on the ballot paper. Indeed, he's his major opponent.
And what we know is that Farage should win. He is, with the bookies at this point of time, the overwhelming favourite. Reform still has strong support in Clacton as far as we know.
But suppose he does win, but with a smaller majority, which is highly likely. This election is in midsummer. People will be on holiday. People won't be interested in turning out for an election in the political dead season of the summer.
People may also just group around Binface and oppose what Farage is trying to do. There could be a strong tactical vote against Farage, and we've seen this in recent elections. By-election after by-election is now showing people find a candidate who is opposed to the fascism of Farage, and they vote for them.
What is more, alienated people may realise Farage is as much in the swamp and mire of politics as anyone else. In itself, a reduced majority that could result from all of this would carry a political message. Farage's stunt would've failed, and if he loses, he'll be out of Parliament, the inquiry will be over, but Reform will be dead. Either way, he is in deep trouble. And even if he wins, the standards investigation will guarantee another by-election, and then he might lose on the second attempt.
So the threat to Farage is one story here, but Binface is another. The real story is the weakness of mainstream opposition to the neoliberal narrative of all the leading parties. Farage's attack from the right is failing. Binface is proving there is a need for an alternative. And the established parties have chosen not to fight.
In itself, that says something very important. They cannot come up with the strategy of the sort that a satirist has. This is a real issue: when a satirist is the alternative, we see the scale of the issue facing the mainstream politics of the UK. They, too, are being lampooned because they have no answers, and that is what Binface is saying.
This then tells us something about ourselves. This by-election shows that we urgently need a non-fascist counter-narrative to neoliberalism and our politics of failure. That task ultimately requires serious politicians dedicated to a politics of care, the thing I talk about on this channel. Until they appear, satire is filling the gap with what looks like a nascent politics of care.
A man in the dustbin should not be the principal opposition in British politics, but whatever happens in Clacton, Britain should pay attention. We need real alternatives. We need them now. We need to consign neoliberalism to the bin, and that is as important as putting Farage in it. We need what is not much less than a political revolution. We need a new politics, and Count Binface is showing us that this might be possible.
Don't dismiss this man as a joke candidate. He might be one of the most important influences on the direction, or rather the redirection, of British politics that has emerged for a long time. I wish him well. I hope he wins. I think he might. This could be the start of something big.
That's what I think. What do you think? There's a poll down below. Please vote. Please let us have your opinions. Please share this video, and if you'd like to make a donation so that we can make more of these in this hot, sweaty summer, that will be great because they really do help.
Poll
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

Buy me a coffee!

[…] The video that this Debate Ammunition supports is available here. […]
I just hope Count Binface doesnt end up with heatstroke given the weather we are having
Well OK then, Binface is absurdism in action then, is that it? I can get that – I can get all the symbolism you can offer me about it. And I also get the extremely serious point about what it tells us about the state of our politics. But it is still a bit of high-wire act that undermines democracy for some – that it might discredit political involvement and hasten/increase disengagement? The nuances of satire do not work on many – Mike Parr knows all about that!
For me, the polling booth is not the battle ground anymore. Despite Binface, despite even the well constructed argument you present here there is something immovable and obdurate at work here that has reduced this all to pantomime anyway. Agreements have been made; cash and promises have been exchanged long ago on cabinet sofas and emails. We can have as many Binfaces as we like, but we will not be listened to. We out here will continue to play at politics whilst ‘they’ in there (parliament) will continue to sell us off.
My view remains is that what politics needs is a an external shock to the system that rallies an alternative view. Actually we have that already – look at the far Right. But the Left has no answer. And we have declining participation. The ballot box has become more or less redundant and the enemies of democracy will just continue to adapt around its weaknesses, taking illiberal advantage of the weak liberal polices of our non-functional constitution whose weaknesses date back to ancient Greece and remain fundamentally unaddressed. Yes Binface is funny, but actually its no laughing matter really, is it?
I am not sure we are very far apart here.
Even if we were not, it’s not a problem is it? We agree on much else. Or should I say, I agree with you at least, as you do most of the writing! I support you whenever I can. FWIW. I mean, who the hell am I anyway? Let’s be honest.
It is amazing to hear R4 comedy shows like ‘Dead Ringers’ and ‘The Naked Week’ telling us the serious truth about our lives embedded in humour, and laughing at it and looking knowingly at each other at the table.
And where we should be hearing these truths – in politics – we have what can only be described as a lack of seriousness. A lack of serious politics. A lack of serious economics as well.
What is ‘serious politics’? A quick definition would be ‘the fair management of the allocation of natural and man made resources to meet the competing needs of groups in societies, leaving none at less than the other, promoting peaceful co-existence’. Would that do? And we don’t get this at all.
My problem with Binface, the Raving Loony Party et al is that they demean politics which is a fucking serious business, because fairness is a bloody serious matter for us all. Fail to deal with that, and you release human demons that open the door to Death. That is why the capitalist grip on politics has to be addressed. Capitalism as you have often pointed out Richard, simply cannot account for what it takes. We simply cannot afford capitalism as it is and that includes the sums it is allowed to invest in politics and the returns it demands. One of things taken that cannot be afforded is the undermining of the vote. And it is happening.
I think Binface is serious – as the court jester omce was
And I agree, politics is a serious business.
I gather the by-election will be on the 13th not the 6th of August.
[I would have thought that Parliament should set out that if an MP wanted to resign for health or other reasons they could do so but otherwise they should be barred from standing in the by-election].
Minor point, but thank you
Interesting, I just watched an interview by the german podcast “Jung & Naiv” with Yonatan Zeigen yesterday on Youtube.
Worthwile watching, it’s also completely in English. 🙂
The jewish-palestinian party “A Place for us all” that runs in the upcoming Knesset election is indeed an astonishing alternative as the name alone already implies.
Zeigen also argues that, offered a real & good alternative, the people will very likely go for it.
I think the only hard part is for those alternative to be known.
Concerning Count Binface, credit where credit’s due: Farage did a good job for him.
Certainly agree that the one thing proto fascists can’t stand is ridicule. <p>
Nearly all politicians acknowledge that people are turned off politics – while doing precisely nothing about it .<p>
The Clacton by-election might be a perfect parody of the state of our democracy . Will that shock our politicians enough to begin to clean up the system?<p>
Probably not . It is so corrupted by factionalised illegal money , buying and selling all main parties. Parties have tiny memberships, faction leaders don’t want party members – all incentives encourage dark money and vested interess. <p>
Yes bring on Count Binface – hope even in Clacton enough can see the funny side to vote for him. But our politics will probably continue to rush towards the abyss.
Very much agree. The hard- and far-right cannot stand being laughed at, any more than they like being questioned. Relentless laughter combined with dragging their activities into the cleansing sunlight of scrutiny is how we deal with them.
“Hard-right populism has shaped much of political debate in this country. The mainstream parties have struggled to answer it. And politics has become cautious and managerial over the last 40 years of neoliberal rule.” Forgive me if I unpack these three sentences.
“hard right populism”, thus turds in rivers (or high elec prices) is both “hard right” and popular with the populace?
LINO & Tories are part of the “hard right”
Managerial – to manage. Is high elec prices & turds and shit roads – indicators of management success?
Neoliberalism has delivered all the negative outcomes mentioned. For 40 years politicos of all stripes have “gone along with this” because it is the easy route. With perhaps max 20 exceptions, all MPS should be removed from office and a collection of Binfaces put up for election. I have long held that in many cases electing a village idiot could not do more harm to the UK than the time servers, imbeciles and crooks and “complicit in genocide” that infest wezzie. Root & branch clear out.