I helped the Sunday Telegraph with a report out today on a charity called the Portland Trust promoted by Sir Ronald Cohen, a close adviser to Gordon Brown and the person seen as the 'father' of the UK private equity industry.
As we reveal, this is a charity that in one year paid almost half its income to leading private equity company Apax Partners for rent and management services. It also pays its staff over £100,000 a year each on average. As the Telegraph notes, based on my research:
By comparison, no employee at the charities Christian Aid and Save the Children Fund receives more than £100,000. The best-paid officials at the RSPCA and the Prince's Trust receive less than £110,000.
Despite this, there is no record of the Portland Trust having achieved anything to date. As the charity told the Telegraph:
Four years after its creation, the charity's flagship project, a "loan guarantee scheme" to help small and medium-sized firms in Galilee and the Palestinian territories secure funding, has yet to be launched.
Mr Freud said 300 businesses had benefited from the charity's work to date but admitted that progress had not been as rapid as hoped.
The issue is being reported to the Charity Commissioners in the UK. It raises serious issues for UK tax law. We are asking why the accounts are so opaque when charity accounting standards are now specific about the requirements for transparency.
But most of all I'm just curious about the relationship with both Apax and Ronald Cohen, who I suspect needs to prove his Middle East links to keep his domicile in the region.
Answers are needed on these points or such a strange entity should lose its charitable status. Let's hope they are forthcoming.
NOTE added 29-2-08: The Portland Trust has advised me that the Charity Commission found no issues to investigate as a result of the referral made to them by the Sunday Telegraph.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
I run the BUSM Pensions Action Group in Leicester, part of the nationwide campaign for compensation for those who lost their company pensions.
However our scheme was underfunded. Senior managers submitted 2 reports to the Government alleging the owners Apax planned the destruction of BUSM, as a vehicle for removing via insolvency £10m of employee debt from its recently demerged sibling, Texon.
I desperately want to hear the case for the defence but am convinced Apax crossed the legal line. Calls for an enquiry have been supported by MPs of both parties including Patricia Hewitt.
Would any other company have been able to resist these calls? Were MPs misled into thinking there was an investigation when there wasn’t? As Apax quickly pointed out, the pensions Ombudsman cannot investigate shareholders.
The Observer produced a good summary
http://money.guardian.co.uk/statepensions/story/0,,2099442,00.html
My own summary includes public domain references, and is at
http://blog.find.co.uk/2007/06/time_to_uncover_role_of_privat.html#comments