Many newspapers give appropriate attention this morning to a new report from the Public Accounts Committee that says HMRC is struggling with its workload and that Brexit can only make matters worse. I agree with that conclusion. But I wanted to highlight another aspect of the report, which says:
HMRC does not know whether a large number of tax reliefs deliver value for money. HMRC currently provides 424 tax reliefs. The number of tax reliefs continues to grow, increasing the complexity of the tax system. HMRC estimates that 105 of these tax reliefs cost £416.8 billion in 2017-18. HMRC estimates that a further 80 tax reliefs have nil or negligible cost. But HMRC does not report a cost for the remaining 239 tax reliefs because in the large majority of cases it considers the cost of collecting the data needed would be disproportionate, although it does make internal estimates for some of these reliefs. Gaps in HMRC's understanding of costs means it cannot assess the value for money of many tax reliefs designed to deliver particular policy objectives. It also limits the input HMRC can make into HM Treasury's decisions on the design and scale of existing and new reliefs.
Recommendation: HMRC should take more responsibility for ensuring tax reliefs provide value for money. In particular, HMRC should set out, by April 2019, an approach for improving its understanding of the cost for those tax reliefs where it does not already have that information.
Let's be clear about what this means. What the PAC is saying is that HMRC is not keeping proper books and records that detail the spends that they manage. That's because they do not think it worthwhile doing so. And as a result the message is clearly made that HMRC does not know the consequences of the tax system that they manage on behalf of the government.
That, in my opinion, is a dereliction of duty.
It is also a failure to comply with EU law, which has required that such a record be kept since 2015, but I guess with Brexit on the horizon no one is worrying about this anymore.
My concern is threefold. The first is that this has been known for some time and HMRC management do not seem to care. That makes them unsuited to the task entrusted to them. Whatever their private sector logic and experience might be, they seem not to understand the obligation to manage public funds.
Second, what this means is that tax reliefs might be abused and no one would know. That is reckless indifference by HMRC. It also, inevitably, means that their tax gap estimates are wrong.
Third, it means people are being provided with benefit without good reason. When benefits are being denied to people who need them this offends me, considerably.
However viewed, this is gross mismanagement. The PAC is being too kind in HMRC. Its management has to account or go in my opinion. By the standards they set for others they are failing. And that is not good enough.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Not having full accounts is also what the right wing media used to castigate the EU for before it decided such things were too minor to bother with. Also the EU was quite robust in its responses which must have been dismaying for them.
BTW Safari reports your website certificate is expired, three days ago. I had to jump through a hoop to load it. I thought you should know.
Nothing will stop me reading your blog, sanity in a world gone mad.
In other news @Moneymonopolist has taken Kevin Hague to task showing him up by being patient, learned and unfailingly polite. So of course our Kev blocked him. I’m reminded of your interactions with Kev.
Peter
We have renewed the certificate
I hope if you renew your cache that this should clear: mine has
And dear old Kev….who still has me blocked but can’t help talking about me every now and again, I gather
You could add a fourth concern which is that if a taxpayer argued that they didn’t know the benefit of expenditure to their business (wholly, necessarily etc…) it would be disallowed.
If HMRC was a company it would be in breach of the Companies Act – proper books of account.
How can we not properly fund our internal revenue service? It beggars belief.
Agreed
Hi Richard, I have just drawn this blog posting to the attention of Derek Mackay MSP, Finance Minister @ Holyrood…. in the hope that it will assist him in his attempts in setting up a more balance, fairer and just taxation system for Scotland in our move towards independence….
I am aware that you have given evidence to one, at least, of our Holyrood committees so your name will not be totally unknown to him & he will not simply dismiss it as ‘another blogger’….
If you are ever considering a move to ‘furrin parts’ can I suggest that your expertise would be warmly welcomed in an independent Scotland…
Derek and I have met and he is certainly familiar with my work
Thanks for sending