First there was Madoff, and his massive fraud.
On a slightly smaller scale last week was the arrest of Marc Dreier, an American lawyer who sold $100 million plus of bonds to clients that simply did not exist.
Of course, these events happened in New York. But let's not forget New York is, like London, a tax haven. It's hard to split them off from their satellites. These are systemic failures in a financial world where places like Cayman and New York are effectively inseparable.
Second, let's note that this proves that whatever systems are in place at present they are ineffective.
Third, let's speculate about whether effective regulation of the system we've had is possible, and therefore whether we can afford to keep it. I suggest we cannot regulate it and as a result root and branch reform of the system is needed. Tinkering with regulatory reform will not be enough.
Finally, as the First Post says:
The lesson to be drawn from Madoff's and Dreier's downfall is not that of two rotten apples. Nor were these a couple of befuddled geezers lost in the new financial universe. The lesson is that anyone who became insanely rich these past few years providing financial services is now under suspicion.
This is correct. We hear the 'rotten apples' argument too often. After Enron, Parmalat, et al. But it's wrong. The orchard is diseased. That's the real problem. And the canker has to be eliminated.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
So you will now be wanting to close down New York I assume ?
If you are asking do I think we should restrict this form of trading the answer, quite clearly, is yes, do.
As we have seen of late, there is no evidence it can add value to society even when done legally.
So why take the risk it imposes whether done legally or illegally?
We are better off without it
Richard
That was not my question !
Your standard approach is to use a sledghammer to crack a nut whenever anything offshore is concerned. You want to close down tax havens whenever an offshore “scandal” emerges, regardless of anything else that the jurisdiction in question has done to appease other governments. When that “scandal” happens in London or New York you should therefore surely be pressing to close them down as well.
Its very easy for you to try to bully the little guys isn’t it ?