HMRC dedicate a lot of time in their response to my work on the tax gap saying why my estimate of tax evasion might be wrong. What they fail to acknowledge are the very obvious deficiencies in their own work, which they have admitted elsewhere in 2009, saying (page 22):
At present tax gap estimates are available for the main sources of revenue loss in Income Tax, National Insurance Contributions, Capital Gains Tax and Corporation Tax.
Direct tax gap estimates are produced using “bottom-up” methods. This means that components of the tax gap are estimated using departmental sources, such as surveys, administrative and operational data. The bottom-up method is less comprehensive than the top-down method used for indirect tax gap estimates because by its nature much of the gap arises from activities that are deliberately concealed. In addition because the bottom-up methods are based on compliance activity which can, in some cases, take years to complete the resulting tax gap estimates typically apply to earlier periods than those from the top-down methods.
They neither admit this to parliament, or acknowledge that my work overcomes these deficiencies. Instead they seek to dismiss it on grounds that are spurious, as I will show when I have time. But its the sheer dishonesty of their not admitting their own work is seriously deficient when they know that to be true that annoys me right now.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Who’s pulling the strings at HMRC? It’s clear they think they are on the side of business interests rather than the majority of people in this country. From their website – “We are here to ensure the correct tax is paid at the right time..” – Not.
Not strings: Reins.
How are HMRC getting-on with their idea of having all PAYE wages/salaries paid into their accounts and then, after removing PAYE and NI contribs paying the remainder into the earners account ?
Still on the agenda is it ?
Or has the .GOV IT system still not improved over its total disaster such as to allow that; yet ?