The ideological roots of this agenda lie in neoliberal economics, shaped by Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, and actively promoted today by organisations such as the Atlas Network and the Tufton Street network of think tanks. Their programme deliberately weakens social cohesion, normalises inequality and insecurity, and strips public services to the bone. The Tory government between 2010 and 2024 put this into practice as a matter of deliberate policy and Labour has done precious little to reverse it.
Economic stress fuels resentment, and the elite redirect that resentment toward scapegoats from minority ethnic groups, to women, and LGBTQ+ people, all to maintain their hold on power and wealth.
The result is the rise of authoritarian politics across the UK and beyond. It is profoundly revealing that recent polls suggest large numbers of Church of England attendees would vote for Reform, a party whose values are, in every meaningful sense, completely alien to the Christian tradition.
Easter's core command is not complicated: love your neighbour as yourself. That is not a partisan slogan. It is a universal ethical imperative shared across religions and humanitarian traditions alike. If Easter means anything, it requires us to choose renewal over division, to rebuild public services, to resist the politics of exclusion, and to name the forces that profit from our fragmentation.
This is the audio version:
This is the transcript:
This is Easter Sunday. Happy Easter if you're celebrating.
Easter is meant to bring a message of hope, renewal, and resurrection, yet hope feels hard to find in the world today. Fascism is rising in many countries, including in the UK. War in the Middle East is escalating with global consequences. Social media and our politics are increasingly toxic and divisive. The contrast between the hope promised by Easter and the reality of life as we see it all around us is stark, and let's be clear, the division we are seeing is both intentional and organised.
Those who are organising it are targeting those who are economically weak or socially marginalised inside our societies to exploit them for gain. Minority ethnic groups, women and LGBTQ+ people are being singled out. Enemies are being constructed to justify hostility and exclusion, and a small elite is benefiting from this division and conflict. Their goal is to enhance their own wealth and security at cost to everyone else in society. This narrow elite is promoting policies that are deliberately designed to harm collective well-being at this point in time.
The elite in question is overwhelmingly male, white and self-identified as Christian, although I doubt the reality of their faith. Their politics is built on exclusion rather than inclusion.
Well-being is being sacrificed to protect privilege and power. Economic security is being used as a tool of political control, and this is political economy in action, not by coincidence.
This agenda has deep ideological roots in neoliberal thought. Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman shaped this framework just after World War II. Their ideas prioritised markets over social responsibility. Think tanks have promoted this agenda for decades. The Atlas Network has been promoted around the world to achieve this goal, and here in the UK, the Tufton Street network of Think Tanks is part of this ecosystem and well known for its action inside our political sphere.
Neoliberal policy has the deliberate aim of weakening social cohesion. It has normalised inequality and insecurity. Public services and social security have been undermined quite deliberately. The Tory government between 2010 and 2024 did that as a matter of policy, but Labour has done very little to change it.
Economic stress is fueling resentment and division, and that resentment is being redirected by the elite who are creating this structure towards scapegoats chosen by that same elite that are creating the resentment in the first place. The result is that this creates the condition for authoritarian politics.
It's not meant to be like this. Easter is meant to be about hope, renewal, and reconciliation. It celebrates the possibility of transformation. It carries a message of forgiveness and shared humanity. These values promote collective well-being, yet they're absent from much of contemporary politics. This contradiction is what demands our attention.
The fact is that many who claim Christian identity are those now promoting division and conflict in the UK. Recent opinion polls have suggested, for example, that large numbers of people who attend Church of England services would vote for Reform in a coming general election, a party that is promoting values that are completely alien to the Christian tradition. These actions contradict the teachings these people claim to follow. Faith is being used to justify exclusion rather than compassion. The message of love is being replaced with one of hostility, and this represents a profound moral and political inconsistency, and it also exposes the gap between belief and behaviour.
My own faith is Christocentric in its focus. The teachings of Jesus are central to my Quaker thinking. This reflects my upbringing in the Church of England, I admit, but I do not focus on doctrine or personal salvation. I focus on the practical, ethical message that is implicit within the teachings of Jesus. That message is about how we treat each other, and it is about creating what he called the kingdom of heaven here on earth.
The key instruction is to love our neighbour as ourselves. This is a practical command and not an abstract idea. It requires both self-respect and care for others, and too many people in this world now fail to love themselves. That failure, which appears to be commonplace amongst many of the world's leaders, may fuel their hostility towards others. The result is harm to both them and the societies they are governing, and it is creating a crisis for both politics and humanity.
We can see this in the Middle East, which reflects this failure very clearly. Leaders on all sides are ignoring the ethical imperative to love our neighbours as ourselves. I stress the instruction to care is universal and not selective, and it is, in any case, to be found in all religions and in humanitarian thinking. It applies equally in Iran as elsewhere. Without it, conflict and suffering will persist, and that is my concern.
Easter Hope requires that we choose renewal over division. It demands a commitment to care and mutual respect. Economic policy in this case must support well-being for all. Social security and public services must be strengthened. We must resist ideologies that promote exclusion. Hope is created by what we choose to do next. Will we choose peace and a politics of care? That is what we need this Easter.
That's what I think. What do you think? Let us know on this Easter Sunday, take a moment, have a look at the poll down below, share a comment, share your Easter greetings; we will read them. And if you like this video, please share it, like it, and subscribe to our channel. Happy Easter.
Poll - you may vote up to 4 times
Loading ...
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

Buy me a coffee!

For me it all boils down to a picture I was shown in primary school. Well two, nearly identical pictures. The first was a scene of very unhappy people who were starving, even whilst surrounded by a sumptuous banquet. The cutlery they had was very long, and so they couldn’t reach their mouths with it. They were miserable, aggressive and angry with each other because they were surrounded by wonderful food but they couldn’t eat anything.
The second picture was of similar people, the same cutlery and banquet set-up as the first. However, these people were happy and healthy. Unable to feed themselves, they instead fed each other.
Heaven vs Hell. I think, like Evil, they do exist in the mortal realm.
There’s enough food in this world. The fact that we can’t distribute it to everyone is on us. The power is ours to create a heaven or a hell. Right here on earth.
Thus I choose compassion and care.
Thanks to all for a timely article.
Some might find the book by Jacques Ellul, entitled “The Subversion of Christianity”, which addresses this matter, of interest. It is easily available in English.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Subversion_of_Christianity
Today we are in a state of flooding yet have no water to drink.
“Love is patient, love is kind; love is not envious or boastful or arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rejoiced in the truth. It bears all things, believed all things, hoped all things, endured all things. Love never ends.” 1 Corinthians 13:4 – 8
We could substitute the words a self centred person for love and reverse the action. A self centred person is not patient; a self centred person is not kind. A self centred person is envious and boastful and arrogant and rude. A self centred person insists on his or his own way , rejoices in wrongdoing and does not rejoice in the truth. A self centred person does not believe anything, hope in anything or endure anything. A self centred person always fails.
There is a desperate need today for the right ordering of love. Our nature as humans beings is to love and seek love but we have mindless greed and a relentless pursuit of power which is destroying our capacity to give and receive love. It is noticeably absent and so desperately needed in our world.
Richard we won’t always get it right and you come across daily the general spirit of indifference and occasional expressions of hostility but there is hope. Hope that somehow we will rediscover the centre of value they will provide the meaning, purpose and direction we so desperately need.
Across time and throughout history, Gods love has touched countless people.
Our hearts are restless until they find their rest in thee .. Augustine
Happy Easter … He is risen
Thanks
I hadn’t seen this before I posted about the budget but I would like to add something.
As a young man I bought a paperback on Buddhism by Christmas Humphreys, a judge thought a bit odd as he was against the death penalty -or so I heard. In Eastern religions human consciousness is part of a greater whole out of which we recycle in successive incarnations.
It still comes closest to my thinking today and the Quaker meeting has that flavour -to me, at least. I have attended a number in the last year. I am not sure what i get from it but keep going back.
In my view the great religions teach similar ultimate truths to what you are saying.
Thanks
It has become clear to me over the years is that religion is not the problem.
It is unfortunate human behaviour – weakness – within religion that is the problem – as with most of our institutions as well.
Religion – as with much else – has been commandeered by the extreme individualism of Neo-liberalism.
Weakness rules – and look how our societies fall apart. As an atheist, this has really made me think.
Two of Jesus’ disciples were members of Jewish organisations dedicated to the violent overthrow of Rome, and the liberation of the Jewish people from pagan rule. Palm Sunday was thought to be part of a prophesied apocalyptic scenario involving the Messiah leading an uprising against Rome, with divine assistance, and restoring the true Davidic king, the lion of Judah (not the hated Herod) to the throne in Jerusalem. In the 2nd Temple period such apocalyptic ideas were very popular, after centuries of imperial occupation, reviving memories of the Maccabean anti-imperial revolt 3 centuries before.
The two violent disciples were Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot. (Iscariot=member of the Sicarii – derived from the word for “dagger”)
Judas hoped that by betraying Jesus, he could provoke him to lead this violent rebellion, and bring in God’s kingdom. As do many Christian Zionists today, by twisting scripture and ignoring Jesus’ teaching and example.
Simon the Zealot listened to Jesus, and chose a different path, of peace, with a message of hope to all nations. Judas, on the other hand, put his hope in betrayal and violent nationalist rebellion.
It is one thing to be mistaken, to miscalculate, or to be deceived. It is another thing entirely to knowingly choose deceit, falsehood, self-interest, cruelty, dishonesty, lying, and murder.
World leaders face that stark choice now.
Good will come out of this. Pehaps a lot of good. What we don’t yet know, is how much evil we will choose to inflict on ourselves and our neighbours first, before the good arrives.
Christ is risen!
He is risen indeed!
KYRIE ELEISON!
Thank you
Happy Easter
As regular church attendance declines one might expect continued attendance to be concentrated amongst those who favour a hierarchal order and thus strict father thinking, the basis of conservative thinking, and the main proponents of that thinking are now Reform.
The declining Catholic inclination toward Labour, mentioned in the referenced article, might well at least in part, have been due to Irish origins of many British Catholics who had a particular historical objection to the Tories, that wouldn’t necessarily extend to Reform, and later generations will probably less inclined to that historical objection anyhow.
Also it doubtless reflects a change in the broader communities they come form.