I was asked this question on the blog yesterday:
Would a mass sell off of US Treasuries by EU and others put pressure back on Trump and his Congress?
Since it is doing the social media rounds, I gave this question some thought and responded as follows (with some editorial improvements on reposting):
Yes, it could, but the chain of effects is indirect and politically messy.
A mass sell-off of US Treasuries by foreign holders would, all else equal, push Treasury prices down and yields up. That would tend to:
- Increase US government interest costs, especially on new issuance.
- tighten US financial conditions, meaning higher rates across the mortgage and corporate debt markets, and
- Unsettle risk markets.
All of that would create political pressure on any administration, including Trump's. However, there are big caveats.
First, Treasuries are the world's core safe asset. In a true panic, many investors often run towards Treasuries, not away from them. So coordinated foreign selling could be partly offset by domestic and global private buying.
Second, the Federal Reserve can stabilise yields through purchases, using measures such as QE, if it chooses. The US, as the issuer of the dollar, cannot be funding-constrained by dollar-relatedissues.
Third, foreign holders selling Treasuries are also harming themselves: they either crystallise losses or they must find an alternative reserve asset of comparable scale and liquidity, and there is none at the same depth at present.
So, foreign sales could signal diplomatic and financial disapproval and cause disruption, but they are not a reliable weapon that would force Congress to change course. It would create pressure mostly via higher rates, market volatility and a weaker dollar, but the US has unusually strong tools to absorb that pressure, meaning the measure might not work.
I do not buy this argument as a result.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Buy me a coffee!
Very much agreed. There is a better way to hit the interests of the USA and that is to go to a UFT tariff and quota system with respect to the USA. Socialism has killed millions in the 19th and 20th century but crony capitalism has killed far more and when Americans see their subsidies to Europe meaning that their production preferentially gets exported then it will mean that they can’t eat. Combine that with their tariffs on imports raising their own prices and unemployment levels and it will really hurt.
No-one wants to see 300 million Americans starving in the street of course, but that’s their problem and an easy one to resolve. It’s our problem to ensure that a 1916 Treaty affecting 57,000 people being a colony of our Danish friends continues to be honoured.
Might it be more effective to have a large-scale, coordinated move away from the dollar for oil sales?
Granted, it didn’t work out well for Iraq/Libya/Venezuela when they tried it individually, but if a sufficiently large bloc could be achieved, this could be hugely disruptive.
I don’t think bg oil is where we should be looking for support. We’re stuffed if we do.
Agreed. “Big Oil” would definitely not be supportive, since most of these are either US-HQ’d or have large US exposure. It would take governments to mandate the change.
“Treasuries are the world’s core safe asset. In a true panic, many investors often run towards Treasuries, not away from them. ” are”? … or “were” – that is the $10 trn dollar question ($10,000,000,000,000 – a lot of zeros) which roughly speaking is what foreigners have invested in US Treasuries.
Co-ordinated, public action by foreign governments seems unlikely. First, they each have different agenda and, to some degree, competing with each other; second, such a public act invites retaliation. There was a suggestion that Canada, Japan and China were selling USTs earlier this year as a “warning shot” in the tariff negotiations but even if there was selling (and there was) it is unclear whether it was official holdings or private sector holders…. and if it was official holdings it did not appear co-ordinated.
I think we are more likely to see something akin to the collapse of the gold standard. Everyone realised that the gold standard was unsustainable given the Vietnam war and the huge hike in oil prices… but they also realised that to demand gold for dollars would usher in an era of instability so everyone stayed put. Until the French broke rank and demanded gold… at which point it was all over.
I think this is what is sustaining the dollar (and USTs) now…. but if someone breaks rank and sells dollars it will be brutal. Defence implications have, historically kept Japan, South East Asia and Europe in line but that might be changing. Also, even if official institutions stay wit the dollar the private flows could still do it.