When writing a post on comment in the Guardian this afternoon, I realised that my glossary entry on financial capital was insufficient to encompass the madness of financial capitalism, financialisation and financial engineering.
I have corrected this by writing glossary entries on each of the last three issues. This is the entry on financial engineering:
Financial engineering refers to the design and use of complex financial structures, instruments, and accounting techniques to reallocate risk, income, and ownership claims, often without creating any new productive capacity.
It is the technical toolkit through which financialisation operates.
Financial engineering commonly involves:
-
Complex structuring
The creation of layered instruments, such as derivatives, securitisations, special-purpose vehicles, and off-balance-sheet entities, that obscure risk and redistribute returns to financial intermediaries.
-
Arbitrage exploitation
Exploiting gaps between tax systems, accounting rules, regulatory regimes, or jurisdictions to extract profit without corresponding economic contribution. Tax havens or secrecy jurisdictions are frequently used to facilitate this goal.
-
Balance-sheet manipulation
Techniques are designed to enhance reported earnings, asset values, or leverage ratios without improving underlying performance or resilience.
-
Risk displacement, not reduction
Financial engineering often claims to “manage” risk, but in practice tends to shift it onto less informed parties, whether they be workers, pensioners, taxpayers, or future generations.
-
Short-term optimisation
Structures are designed to maximise immediate financial return, even when they increase long-term fragility or undermine capital maintenance.
Financial engineering is not inherently neutral. In a financialised economy, it becomes a primary means of rent extraction, allowing wealth to be generated through legal and accounting design rather than through productive or socially useful activity.
Within the Funding the Future approach, financial engineering is viewed as a central contributor to economic opacity, democratic disempowerment, and repeated financial crises. Its prevalence signals an economy organised around claims and control, not care and creation.
Related entries:
- Capital
- Capital maintenance concepts
- Financial capitalism
- Financialisation
- Financial engineering
- Physical capital
- Human capital
- Social capital
- Environmental capital
- Sustainable cost accounting
- Income
Comments
When commenting, please take note of this blog's comment policy, which is available here. Contravening this policy will result in comments being deleted before or after initial publication at the editor's sole discretion and without explanation being required or offered.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

Buy me a coffee!

It was said that the last useful innovation in banking was the ATM. I am inclined to agree.
Having said that, some ‘engineering’ can add value. Indeed. one could argue that traditional banking which delivers diversification, aggregation and maturity transformation is ‘engineering’.
As always it’s a matter of degree and motivation.