Prem Sikka, or Lord Sikka to give him his title, had this exchange in the House of Lords:
So, P&O fails to file accounts for considerable periods of time and apart from the automatically imposed penalties for late filing of accounts no action of any sort is taken against the directors of the company despite the enormous risk to which they are exposing the creditors of the company, including those who have pre-booled tickets for its ferries, and of course, the government with regard to tax due.
Why is that?
Why is the government so indifferent to the apparent abuse of limited liability implicit in the late filing of accounts for such lengthy periods?
When the government is so dedicated to regulating - and rightly so - why is it so indifferent to enforcing the regulation that is put in place, and most especially that which is intended to prevent us from being abused?
How can you want to regulate and ignore regulation at the same time?
What can explain this mindset?
Is it simply that neoliberal politics is now purely performative, and that actual consequences don't matter so long as politicians appear to be doing the right thing?
Or is this something else, which I have occasionally described as constructive non-compliance? In other words, systems that appear to deliver appropriate outcomes are put in place, but then there is a deliberate policy of not enforcing them, making the whole of politics a charade, sham or fiasco.
Is that what neoliberal politics is all about now?
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Buy me a coffee!
It’s was performative. Now they are emboldened and think it is right to take the bread out of the mouths of the weak, the young and old and the disabled.
I think you are close to my opinion which is that politics these days is nothing but theatre?
It’s a performance in public relations terms which as we should know is all about ‘perception management’. It’s about people sounding and looking as though they are doing summat when in fact, doing nowt.
It’s a long way down.
Seems to be confirmed, despite the source:
“Dominic Cummings: Elected Officials Only Read Scripts Given To Them”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vG30gJfj868
“What can explain this mindset?”
LINO MPs (& Lords) go on hols.
LINO MPs (& Lords) use P&O
LINO MPs (& Lords). ……morally & mentally bankrupt, most of em, most of the time.
(good lord, – we can’t rock the boat – can we?)
Now, if P&O were breaking the earnings rules on unpaid carers claiming benefits…..
(Sound of baillifs breaking theough dock gates and seizing a couple of ferries)…
Correct
Given the importance of the services provided by P&O Ferries surely the state of the company should be of some concern to Government.
Apparently not
Key infrastructure must always be vulnerable, apparently.
If they impose one bit of regulation then that is admitting that the whole ideology of a deregulated market self correcting and acting rationally on its own is a fiction. The government can’t be seen to govern, unless it is to impose new restrictions on its people.
@ Tom B…..that is not governing, that is oppression and suppression.
Not sure the ‘neoliberal’ catches it – isnt it that our system of ‘deregulated’ politics and governance is awash with corrupt money from start to finish, and from top to bottom?
Politicians and political parties bought and sold, unlimited ‘earnings’ by MP’s from second jobs , the cash for honours, cahs for lobbyists, cash of contracts –
And as RobertJ says – the grotesque punishment to carers contrasting with the almost offical collusion with corporate crime
In asking why there’s no effective punishment for non-compliant companies, you’re asking for turkey politicians to vote for xmas and transport themselves willingly to Bernard Matthew’s gates.
Agreed, John. A £3k fine is a mere bagatelle to a huge company like P&O and only incites them to repeat their lack of audited accounts year after year. Why not a fine commensurate with the company’s financial status?
I wish I could answer that
The fine would be the same if this was a tiny, one person company
Indeed. In Finland you get fined for motoring offences based on your income.
“Is the whole of politics a charade, sham or fiasco?”
All & ………..led by utter complete & total imbeciles & charlatans.
Here is the utter doorknob Hannan writing in 2016 as to what the Uk will be like in 2025.
https://www.reaction.life/p/britain-looks-like-brexit
In a normal society this man would be in an asylum for fantasists where he could do less harm.
It is worth reading the below the lines. Hannan is no diff to the LINO charlatans they are all cut from the same cloth.
God help the UK, run by Zionists and populated in the political sphere by morons.
I knew Danny Hanny was bad, but… wow!
Why isn’t he cebrating independence day with appearances on every podcast and news/current affairs programme for a line by line analysis of that triumph of prophetic brilliance?
Led By Donkeys’ take on the doorknob:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bR-AXnvunlo
Very good
“Is that what neoliberal politics is all about now?”
Clearly so
https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5ae6de517c932736b15f2cc7/1589452810930-QGI81KY901BYPWF8EDKE/neoliberal+drivers.png?format=2500w
Now that neoliberalism has become the “government” we arrive at fascism.
If you need cheering up John Crace’s latest political sketch celebrating National Dan Hannan day in the Grauniad is a classic. I loved the comment “ a brain the size of a Higgs Boson particle”.
🙂
Wasn’t it P&O who sacked its sailors with no notice and hired much cheaper labour? Wasn’t there an outcry at the time? And didn’t Louise Haigh get shafted for something she’d already told Starmer about before she was appointed as Transport Secretary; the real reason being she tweeted that zP&O treated their workers appallingly? It was at the same moment as Starmer was being seduced by that global Ports company, who had promised massive investment in the UK. So Haigh had to go on some trumped up nonsense.
The Pirts company (can’t remember the same) is part of the Freeports/SEZ crap being inflicted on us.
The entirety of politics is now corrupt beyond redemption, in my opinion.
There is a complete lack of integrity in government and no one in politics seems to be bothered, apart from a few Labour MPs who have lost the whip for their honesty.