The Republicans in the USA always say they hate debt, except when it is massively increased by Donald Trump as a result of his tax cuts for the wealthy. Then it's OK. But in a world increasingly hostile to the US they might have to think again.
This is the audio version:
This is the transcript:
Donald Trump is planning to massively increase the levels of US national debt.
Now, this isn't something that he announced that he would do in advance when he was running for election because according to the Republicans, the US national debt is the biggest threat to the existence of the nation that exists, despite which Donald Trump did spectacularly good job at increasing it during the course of his first term as president.
Now he plans to repeat that trick by increasing that debt by at least $2.5 trillion during the course of this presidency.
How's he going to do that? Well, according to a budget that has been approved by the US House of Representatives, which is of course the lower house in Congress in the USA, there are going to be tax cuts of $4.5 trillion over Trump's presidential term.
At the same time, there will be cuts in spending of $2 trillion. The difference is not hard to work out. It's $2.5 trillion and that is going to be piled onto US National debt.
Now, let's be clear, the details of this budget are not yet known. These are outline figures that have been approved by the House, and things will change. There are months and months of negotiations to go, not least between the House of Representatives and the Senate, who have a different idea on what to do with regard to the budget, and of course with the President, who has to choose between the options with which he is presented. But the broad thrust is clear. What the Republicans in the House of Representatives want to do is to continue with the Trump tax cuts that were introduced during the course of his first term.
Now, as is commonplace in the USA, those tax cuts that were introduced in 2017 have what is called a sunset clause attached to them. In other words, they were not granted in perpetuity, or forever if you so wish. They were instead granted for a limited period of time, and they are coming up to expire.
The cuts that were given were massive for the wealthy.
In particular, the corporation tax rate in America was cut from 35% to 21%.
Higher rates of tax were cut.
The rate of inheritance tax in the USA - the estate tax - was cut, and effectively the allowance was doubled to reduce significantly the number of estates which were subject to such a charge.
And whilst there were also cuts for ordinary Americans, in comparison to the benefits that went to the wealthy, those cuts for ordinary people in High Street and Midwest USA were tiny.
So what we get, if we get the perpetuation of these cuts, is a continuation of the bung that Trump gave to wealthy America in 2017. It seems highly likely that this is what he is trying to do.
And after all, are we really surprised by that? His supporters are the billionaires who stand to gain most from those cuts, and they're hardly going let him up on that.
So instead, let's look at what the $2 trillion of cuts that he's planning are. These are largely to Medicaid, on which 25% of the US population rely for their medical support, and to nutritional programs which are used to support the most vulnerable people in the USA to ensure that they basically get something called a food stamp - literally support to ensure that they get the sustenance that is required to continue to live. It's that basic, and these programs are literally what Trump is trying to cut to fuel the tax cuts that he wants to give to the rich.
But even so - and this is my important point at this moment - despite the absolute travesty of those two proposals - tax cuts for the wealthy, whilst cutting benefits for people who depend upon them and who are the poorest in US society, by and large - even so, he's planning to increase the US deficit by $2.5 trillion and that is not insignificant.
The total debt at present is $36 trillion.
Now let's be clear about what that debt represents. It is simply money that has been spent into the US economy by the US government, which has yet to be reclaimed in tax.
But the US is in a totally different situation with regard to its deficits from every other country in the world because most countries in the world do not create a currency that the rest of the world is desperate to own. But the world is desperate to own dollars. Some countries in the world literally use it as their own currency, in effect. Panama does legally, as do a few other states, and there are places like Lebanon, where frankly to use the local currency is just pointless. The dollar prevails. So the dollar is a valuable asset way beyond the boundaries of the USA.
And it is because other people around the world want the dollar, not least for oil trading as well, that the US can run such a massive deficit without having to worry about it. But is there a point where it does have to worry?
Now, traditionally, or at least while the Democrats are in office, the Republicans always say that that point has been reached at any point in time - literally any point in time. It doesn't matter what the Democrats do, if they want to increase the deficit, and so the level of US national debt, the Republicans will always oppose it, but they will be relaxed for Trump.
There will be consequences, though, because in a volatile world where trade is going to be less commonplace and where the BRICS countries - that's Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, plus their allies - who between them now control almost half of world trade are planning to trade in oil and other commodities in a currency other than the dollar.
With this, the USA might find that actually funding the deficit of two and a half trillion in the way that it has been used to, by simply dumping it on the rest of the world, is not as easy as they once thought.
There could be real consequences for the USA from this. In particular, interest rates might have to stay higher than they might otherwise have anticipated because the US might need to do that to literally sell these dollars.
They might also find that this is compounded by the tariffs that Trump plans to impose, which will in turn reduce world trade and therefore the demand for the dollar.
The point I'm making is that Trump is planning to increase the US budget deficit and in effect sell $2.5 trillion to the world at a time the world might not want $2.5 trillion, precisely because the USA is really no one's friend anymore.
It is setting out to alienate everyone, and that is what Donald Trump is trying to do. Let's be clear about it. There is no one left who he hasn't really got a gripe with, whether it be those BRICS states in the so-called developing world, or the European Union, or Canada, or whoever else it is that he might wish to pick on, including China.
If he picks a fight with everyone, who is going to want to buy these dollars if they can find an alternative? Well, no one will buy them if they can get that alternative. And what I'm suggesting is that what Trump is really doing is accelerating the moment when the US dollar might not be the reserve currency of the world.
If that ever happens and it's foreseeable, the US economy is going to run in a very different way. Running deficits at free will, which is what it has done, and which Trump is still proposing will become very much harder.
Trump's plan to run a big budget deficit looks to be reckless.
It may be foolhardy.
It could change the world economy for good.
This man is not in control of his own destiny, and if he thinks he is, he might be seriously mistaken.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
It gets worse…………..according to Naked Capitalism (a very quick skim), is it really true that the U.S. Treasury is being urged to buy into bitcoin as well!
It makes you wonder how long it will take U.S. voters to realise that they voted in a prince of thieves as president, and what Putin-like steps he will take to secure his position.
A crypto reserve is being created…
Total madness
The way Trump and DOGE are behaving, will the US ever again have accurate accounts? Also, if Trump doesn’t like some data he sees, he’ll just change it. Anything from the US now has to be examined suspiciously and with care, as their reality is no longer ours.
Even so, it will, of course, be interesting to see the data.
Good point
It is difficult to think of anything that Trump has got right.
Clearly he does expect to significantly increase the deficit.
That is in line with past Republican presidents who tend to increase the deficit more than Democrats. The president who most spectacularly increased the deficit is one Ronald Regan, who is feted by Republicans. See:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1366899/percent-change-national-debt-president-us/
However, taken in context with the size of the US economy, about $25 trillion, the increase in the deficit is only 2.5% per annum. With inflation around 3% this is not, IMO, an unreasonable increase. I wonder what Stephanie Kelton would say.
As you say, Trump will give the money he creates to the wealthy. This is a tremendously bad idea (Trump seems to like “tremendous” things). It’s not just the immorality of it. It’s the fact that the wealthy will tend not to spend this money (they have a low propensity to spend). Instead they will stash it with their other savings and “investments”. It won’t circulate in the real economy as it needs to do.
What are the likely consequences? Well, a lot of that $2.5 trillion will end up in the stock market; there’s few other places for it to go. This will stoke up an overheated stock market further, which is a very bad idea (it will crash at some point, we just don’t know when). Meanwhile, in the real economy, inequality will increase and the economy will tend to stagnate (because there is too little circulating currency given inflation).
Combine the increased deficit with tariffs, which will hike inflation, and you end up with stagflation.
Perhaps increasing the deficit will be damaging to the rest of the world, I don’t know, but Trump’s economics will certainly be very bad for the US economy.
You have said debt doesn’t matter if you have a fiat currency and can print. Have you changed your mind?
I have never said debts don’t matter
I have said debts need to be understood – which most people don’t do
And I have said deficits matter if they are inflationary
Your problems are a) you have not been paying atrention and b) you are making stuff up
Richard, I totally agree with your analysis. I also agree with your prior video that once the markets realize Trump is serious about tariffs, the markets will go down. I think that’s happening now. A more puzzling question I’ve had is what will happen to the price of US treasury bonds?
I would’ve assumed tariffs would increase inflation and thus I would’ve thought treasury yields would go up. However, they are going down as people buy treasuries in a flight to safety.
But now, after reading your article, which I happen to agree with, I don’t see how treasuries would be a good way to diversify away from equities… If Trump increases the debt, who the hell would wanna buy a Treasury bond?
So, we may be in for a bout of stagflation in which both stocks and bonds are in for a ferocious bear market.
Sigh… So I guess that leaves cash as maybe the safest place to hide (assuming there is a safe place to hide) as this fast moving coup plays out.
Any thoughts?
That risk exists in the US.
The risk of major financial failure in the US exists.
I tend to think cash is probably the safe bet at the moment.
US stocks seem overvalued and likely to crash sometime, though it is difficult to estimate when a crash may come. A US crash will, likely, be exported to the rest of the world as in the GFC. So the FTSE is also at risk (plus, separately, recession risk in UK).
And yes I guess savers are moving to US Treasury bonds. This will push down yields. Recently I would have said that US bonds were as safe as it gets. But not now. It seems entirely possible that the US government may choose to default (e.g. if it doesn’t raise the debt ceiling), even though it needs never default. So perhaps not US bonds.
In the UK I guess gilts are still safe.
🙁
I would not go near the dollar right now.
That is not investment advide. That is political economic obervation.
The Russians have been doing trade with China and India and possibly others for years without the use of the dollar. For a long time the Dollar has been the currency of choice for international trade. But if too many other countries choose to exchange their own currencies rather than use the dollar, then demand for dollars could drop rapidly, and as you suggest, leave the USA highly exposed in terms of their debt. Interesting, and crazy, times.