As if evidence was required that the government has chosen that the UK's people should suffer for Covid whilst landlords and banks (as noted in my previous blog post this morning), I see that The Observer has noted this morning that:
The number of UK households struggling with heavy debt has increased by two thirds since 2017, according to new analysis. Debt Justice, a charity that campaigns against unjust debt, has found that about 12.8 million adults in the UK are falling behind on bills or finding repayments a heavy burden. It is calling for urgent action to prevent people being “trapped in poverty”.
I am entirely unsurprised by this finding. Let me go back to something else I wrote on 4 March 2020 when I discussed what might happen as a consequence of Covid:
Ignoring, for a moment, the health risks that this epidemic brings to us all, the economic risks should be fairly apparent. For many that risk comes from a simple lack an income: that there is a widespread risk to many people resulting from inadequate sick pay has already been highlighted on this blog, and elsewhere. In some ways this is the greatest risk of all because unless it is tackled the actual epidemic will be worse.
The fact that this risk exists does, however, also indicate the crisis that we face because of cuts in our social safety net, and the economic risk that arises from the massive inequality in the distribution of wealth in this country. When more than half the households in the UK have savings of less than a few hundred pounds their resilience in a crisis of the type that we are facing is marginal, at best. They simply do not have the means to weather this storm. And, more particularly, many of those households will have considerable outstanding debt which has to be serviced, and they will be unable to do that. The risk that there will be considerable financial stress for those in this situation, both now and in the future as a consequence of failed credit ratings, is enormous, with staggering social consequences.
It should also be recognised that for generation rent, the risks from non-payment are very high, and the chance that rent defaults over this period will increase is significant. Again, the vulnerability of our social model will be cruelly exposed, with the word cruel being used in a very particular and literal way.
And the risk of debt failure does not end with those in the most marginal situations. Many apparently more resilient households, based at least upon income, are actually dependent upon regular cash flow to meet their obligations. Mortgage rates may be low, but for many households mortgage obligations are proportionately high, as are the obligations to make payment on other loans, including the staggering number of car leases in this country. Again, the risks of default are very high with very long term social consequences unless systems are adapted to allow for the stresses that are going to arise, inevitably. In a country built on debt, where credit status is key to financial viability, a very large number of people are going to see their well-being severely damaged by this epidemic unless action is taken to help them now.
What might that action be? The obvious actions are that:
a) The government will need to declare rent holidays;
b) Mortgage payments must be permitted to be deferred without penalty, simply by extending terms;
c) Lease and other loan obligations must again be subject to loan repayment holidays by the extension of terms;
d) Credit ratings agencies must not be permitted to consider defaults in this period in their future credit ratings.It is important to note that the only real cost within this is to landlords: I am afraid to say that they are going to have to take a hit as a consequence of this epidemic, and that they above all others can afford to do so.
The answer to these issues did, of course, come in the temporary form of furlough.
But furlough came and went. What did not were the underlying issues.
We still have inequality.
We still have far too many people on low pay.
We still have a totally inadequate social safety net.
And we are still a country built on debt and obligations to landlords and banks.
We learned nothing from Covid. All we applied was a sticking plaster in the form of QE-funded furlough that it is now said we will never be able to afford again.
And, far from easing the crisis, the government has gone out of its way to make it worse.
I cannot see how long this can last. At a corporate level, the impending failure of some water companies is evidence that this crisis is going to break. At a personal level, it is only by beginning to cut interest rates very rapidly that the instability that the Bank of England has created can now be contained, managed and possibly survived. They, however, are intent on raising them.
The alternative reaction is now being seen in France.
At some time, those in power are going to appreciate that you cannot devastate the lives of most of the population and have them quietly acquiesce. The claims of bankers and landlords cannot always have priority. The problem is, we seem a very long way from that appreciation dawning on anyone with influence, including in the Labour Party.
I fear that this could become very ugly economically and may be worse than that. That is why I hope for some economic sense that might relieve this tension now.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
If we stand back for the moment and look at this a bit differently, I wonder what the public’s capacity to absorb such hardship is?
Deep down, do we think that the ‘good times’ must always come to an end so we are more accepting of this sort of thing? Boom and bust? Has the North American capitalist model survived because it has left an inherent fatalism in society that helps politicians and bankers to essentially get away with murder? That boom and bust is just ‘natural’ ?
I don’t know – but now with added public control measures, I’m left wondering when, where and if the dam will break.
I’m just contrasting us (and America) to the French. Somehow, further West of mainland Europe, politics has lost is feedback loop.
I had a Conservative canvasser on my doorstep last week (by-election in Somerton&Frome). I asked him “Can you name one thing in this country that has not been broken?” The reply was “Er…Er….the economy?” Even he didn’t sound convinced.
The bronze age civilisation who invented money also invented debt jubilees (debt forgiveness). May be we should resurrect this dangerous idea.
The Bank of England has an unshakeable belief that it can bring down inflation by raising interest rates. Even if this causes a recession.
Both Conservatives and Labour have an unshakeable belief that the Government must “Balance the Books”, its expenditure matched by its tax receipts.
If Richard can read beyond this without exploding, there is a problem –
The two targets are completely irreconcilable.
The more interest rates increase, the more spending by mortgage holders is reduced. Companies find their income reduced, and the harder they find it to service their debt.
Companies shed workers. Companies begin to fail. Those that have jobs are paid less.
Government tax revenues decrease.
At the same time more Government benefits will need to be paid to prevent swathes of newly homeless citizens dying of cold and hunger
As things worsen, the tax gap will grow larger and larger. Of course, private debt will grow unchecked until Little Englanders have sold off their entire country.
What can be done?
Richard has made the case repeatedly against these two fundamental beliefs of financial and political religion. Perhaps one day someone will listen.
How can we make Private Debt “Balance its Books”? We all own Public Debt, but Private Debt is a flood transferring money from the poor to the rich.
I have argued that £s are not just created from thin air but can simply disappear back into thin air. This is a step too far for Richard, but if it is true, it offers a Government more leeway than it thinks.
Finally, we need to think about exchange rates.
I think about exports and imports as just normal trade, with an exchange rate included in the transaction.
That exchange rate is the sum of every different type of transaction. When the Bank of England raises interest rates, it should make UK bonds more attractive, causing foreign investors to buy £s and raise the value of sterling. This will make imports easier to buy, which may reduce inflation. However, it is only a temporary fix. In the longer run, the bond and its interest will need to be repaid, pushing down the value of sterling.
I can’t see the Bank of England’s actions doing anything to make sterling more viable in the longer term. Raising interest rates will not tempt foreign buyers if they think the £s they are repaid will be less valuable.
Where is the strategy to increase self-sufficiency and decrease our need for other currencies?
Where is the strategy to help exporters?
By the end of 2024, a Labour Government will inherit worse problems and have less leeway to tackle them. Looking over its shoulder, the international markets will trash sterling if there is any attempt to provide rational solutions.
I a not sure I agree with every word, but thank you
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2023/jun/30/uk-super-rich-beware-pitchforks-torches-unless-they-do-more
Interesting, even the rich are not all happy
Even Peston thinks the Bank has got it wrong.
https://twitter.com/peston/status/1675047074046304257?s=46&t=2pd-wA0a1XK6kGr2IKMKCA
Even some writers at The Telegraph thinks the BOE has got it wrong!