I have already discussed the Treasury's callous proposal to increase taxes on the wealthy without compensating tax cuts for those on lower incomes that features in some, right-wing, newspap[er this morning, obviously as a result of carefully placed leaks. The net effect will be to increase unemployment when we are going to face record levels of unemployment, very soon.
But there is another dimension to this. As the Telegraph notes:
[T]he proposals [from the Treasury] have been met with fierce opposition in No 10, with senior figures said to be instinctively opposed, and expressing frustration that officials are failing to present other options, such as cutbacks to Whitehall departments' current spending budgets.
While Downing Street has indicated it could live with a few billion pounds worth of tax rises, especially the elimination of perceived loopholes for the wealthiest in the areas of capital gains and pensions, Boris Johnson's aides fear conducting a major tax raid on Middle England in the midst of the pandemic risks derailing the economic recovery.
Instead, they favour introducing cuts to current spending, but are said to be highly frustrated at the failure of officials across government to identify unnecessary spending.
The message from Downing Street this morning is, in that case, 'bring back austerity'.
It is as if the lessons of George Osborne's failure have not been learned.
And it is as if we are living in a country with such bounteous government services that of course they are sitting there waiting to be cut.
The reality was that Osborne's austerity failed. It imposed untold harm. It hit the weakest in society by far the hardest. It left countless at risk. Many children were made vulnerable. People died as a result of health care cuts. We were unable to face a pandemic and the consequence has been obvious. And the reason why officials cannot find anything to cut is that they know that to cut will simply create harm. That should be obvious to No. 10 too.
But it's also economically illiterate to think of cuts now. We are going to face massive unemployment in the UK. Official forecasts are only 3 million, or so. I think they are wildly optimistic. But whoever is right, and we do not know as yet, the number looking for work will be as big as any I have known in my lifetime. Most will never have seen anything like this. And every single government spending cut will make this worse. Every cut will cost another job. And there will be no private sector ones to replace them as that part of the economy is weighed down by the shackles of government-backed debt imposed on it to survive 2020.
So, what No. 10 really want is mass unemployment. And I fear that they will not be happy until they get it.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Religion again I fear rather than reality. Thus we must “do Brexit” , “Balance the books”, “Rule the waves” (with a new trade policy comically led by Abbott, the blunder from down under), “Release the animal spirits of the private sector” , and other mantras.
More like policy from I-Spy books! “I spy a shallow platitude!”
Interesting to see what Keir Starmer “doesn’t” say on the subject now the polls show him level pegging with the Tories!
Given that Health care spending increased from £102bn (2008) to £147bn (2018) where are the health care cuts that you refer to?
With respect, if you want to be an idiot, please go and be one elsewhere
Healthcare tracked inflation, although not population
But healthcare needed to do far more than that because there is real healthcare inflation to meet improving methods
But you can ignore that if you wish
Let the blood be on your hands
I also note that’s the eighth identity you have used here
“He estimates that in 2018/19, the amount spent by NHS England on the independent sector was around 26% of total expenditure, not 7% as widely reported”
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/nhs-spending-on-the-independent-sector/
My local hospital now has contracts for oncology with a London hospital. That is a 120-mile travel for me. They don’t even do MSK services any more, they are at the end of a 70 mile journey (total journey miles).
Perhaps no 10 does want mass unemployment. Perhaps Osborne quite deliberately used austerity to create dissatisfaction. Where did these factors lead in earlier times? To the rise of the far right, which perhaps is and has been the real long-term goal all along.