These were the slides I used for a talk to tax officials from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Greenland this morning:
The Transition to Transparency
Nearly eight years since I spoke to you last: what has happened?
- A global financial crisis
- The end of tax havens (Gordon Brown)
- Tax Information Exchange Agreements
- The rise of the tax campaigner
- BEPS
- Country-by-country reporting
- FATCA
- Multilateral information exchange
Have we been on a transition to transparency?
- I hate to be a pessimist…..
Appearances are not everything
- Progress has not been smooth
- And has been marked by frequent failure
- Requiring new policy initiatives
The result is
- I think are there are significant remaining impediments to progress
- And much still needs to be done
Remember the world in 2008?
We were:
- Looking over an economic cliff the size of which we could not comprehend
- Still living in an era where a little voluntary cooperation was seen as the only solution to tax haven abuse
- And the European Savings Tax Directive was the frontier of innovation
And
- People like me were trouble making outsiders who many were all too happy to dismiss
The tax world has changed
I hope we can agree on that.
But:
- My point though is not to describe what has changed
- But to suggest a theory of change
- And to look at what this implies
The theory
- Change on this issue has always been incremental
- Each change, so far, has failed
- But in each change there has been a feedback loop, usually (to date) via the OECD
- And the combination of failure and feedback has, so far, resulted in a fairly rapid process of further change
- But so far it has not delivered success
- And I suggest that this pattern has some way to go as yet
- And the feedback loop may need to change before we get there
April 2009 - the changes
- The aim was to blame someone 'elsewhere' for what was happening on politician's home turf
- Tax havens were easy targets
- The OECD lists appeared like action
- But a target of 12 TIEAs was laughable
- And the truth was that TIEAs could not work, as a matter of fact
- This was politics, but not tax transparency
April 2009 - the failures
- TIEAs were mocked
- The black list was closed in days, and the grey list not long after
- The peer reviews convinced no one
- Occupy and UK Uncut made clear that this was not just an issue of evasion, but of avoidance as well
- The Google story went round the world
- The UK parliament made Google, Amazon and Starbucks totemic
The 2012 / 13 changes
- BEPS began in 2012
- David Cameron put it on top of the G8 agenda in 2013
- He accepted that this was a development issue
- Norway's patient funding of that argument paid off
- Country-by-country reporting topped the demands
- The Lough Erne Summit was the campaigners hey-day
The 2012 / 13 failures
- Developing countries largely excluded from the debate
- And from the data
- CBCR will exist, behind closed doors
- ‘Tax transparency, in secret'
- ‘Trust us, we're transparent: you just can't see it'
- Many other technical solutions are half hearted
- Arm's length pricing survives
- Corporation tax remains in its death throes
- There is no political solution for corporation tax in sight
The FATCA changes
- The US rocks the boat with FATCA in 2010
- BUT it is unilateral
- Most jurisdictions holding out against EU STD development smell the coffee and begin information exchange
- Even Luxembourg
- Austria would have been the last to fall
- The UK and others move to what I called ‘son of FATCA' deals with its havens
- The opportunity for the OECD to create proper multilateral information exchange to replace the bilateral era
The FATCA failures
- The US refuses multilateral exchange
- And becomes the biggest tax haven in the world
- The U.K. demands transparency from its tax havens
- And does not get it
- There is massive resistance to registers of beneficial ownership which are the pre-requisite of the system working
- And places like the UK will produce sham registers
- The likelihood of meaningful data exchange on the tax non-compliant is very low
- The Panama Papers imply only the fools will be caught
The ongoing crisis
- There is a tax gap
- But most countries will not calculate it
- There is a revenue authority resources crisis
- But few countries will acknowledge it
- There is a crisis in company law enforcement
- And no one even talks about it
- The accounting profession still produces accounts wholly unsuitable as a basis for tax
- And get away with it
- Which means we are still 'just dancing in the dark'
- Bruce Springsteen
So what is needed?
- Political will
- Investment of resources
- Tax
- Company law
- Substantially enhanced domestic information exchange regimes
- Massively enhanced tax accounting
- Public CBCR
- Tax Reporting Standards to identify the tax base
- Full transparency on all companies and trusts
- The training to use the data
- Vitally
Why will we get change?
- The next financial crisis will make this happen
- Coming your way soon….
- It's overdue
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

Buy me a coffee!

USA is the biggest tax haven . And will not change.
Griffin ( City of London ) is second– very close behind. Ditto .
Lux and Switz still ” players” . Monaco still under the radar.
Singapore /Hong Kong /Macau making swift headway on the rails the latter two with Chinese blessing.
Things will never really viscerally change. A stable haven will always exist for those with sufficiently deep pockets to pay the accountants ( your profession) to find it.
NATURE ABHORS A VACUUM –WHICH IT QUICKLY PROCEEDS TO FILL
I disagree: this issue can be resolved
And will be, eventually
Nearly spilt my tea when I read Bruce Springsteen as glory days was on the radio.
Excellent
Norway, Sweden, Finland etc.,
All eminently sensible and serious Western countries in my opinion.
Oh well……………….