One of the questions at Tuesday's session of the People's Parliament was how we might both encourage and protect whistleblowers.
I answered in the context of tax. My suggestion was that we should copy the States where tax whistleblowers are paid up to 30% of sums recovered as a result of the information they supply.
Here the Revenue does pay for information but if you're lucky the sum paid might be a thousand or two. However the fact is that whistleblowers often suffer severe economic detriment for acting appropriately. If we are to properly support and protect whistleblowers then I believe we need a much enhanced payment system for information supplied by tax whistleblowers in the UK.
And do remember, paying for information supplied is a well established procedure in other areas of law. This is not creating precedents.
What have we to lose?
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Buy me a coffee!
HMRC isn’t interested in whistleblowers. I know for an absolute fact that my former husband’s property portfolio is producing over £200k gross profit pa. I know because I used to manage the portfolio, but since we separated it makes nothing (I don’t think so!) However, he is claiming that he is making nothing (repeat nothing) in net profits. I know this is rubbish, because of the lifestyle he has, but HMRC doesn’t want to know. As far as they’re concerned I’m an embittered ex-wife – actually I’m concerned he pays the correct amount of tax.
Oddly, divorcees are one of the best sources of information
The problem with existing systems is no one is told outcomes
They should be