Before leaving Liverpool there's time for some thoughts on what Ed Miliband said yesterday.
Like many I thought Ed Miliband proved he's not a man for the big set speech yesterday. His team are going to have to work on that and find settings in which he can communicate better - and give him the training he needs. So Let's be clear now, because this was the case I'm expecting now big 'wow' factor to come from Labour's conference. It won't, and I got the sense here that a lot share that view.
Second, as I've said on Twitter there were some disappointments: I did not think the comments on housing were right. I'm sorry he mentioned benefit fraud and not tax fraud; I'm not sure he needed to say that not all Tory cuts will be reversed because it's simply too early to say that - the state of the economy in time to come may change with the right policies in place.
But those are all the down sides. What was good? There was a lot of that. Fundamentally he's said he won;t accept things the way they have been - including the way Labour has been. It's very clear he will have upset the Labour right - and most of the Tory press by criticising many large businesses and their lack of ethics. But keep pushing this line and this resonates with ordinary people. Everywhere I go this belief that business is out of control - and the banks especially - is commonplace. Rightly commonplace too: it's a fact. He named examples - Murdoch and Southern Cross - but he could have named many more too, starting with Barclays and moving across much of the FTSE.
I note Digby Jones, the former CBI director general and a trade minister under Gordon Brown (but never a member of the Labour party) has described the speech as "divisive and a kick in the teeth" for business. Well I have news for him. He's wrong. I'll reflect separately on what good business is, but what we can be sure of is that Digby Jones is the personification of all that is wrong with it: cronyism, self interest, monopoly abuse, employee abuse, environmental abuse, secretive, indifferent to community, indifferent even to shareholders and those like pensioners who depend on business profits for their future well being.
So what did the speech do? It did, when all is said and done mark a break from the past. I do think on reflection it was bold - and as I said when it ended, it is a shift to the left in the sense that Labour's policy towards business under Blair and Mandelson was utter unquestioning faith in what they saw as the virtue of profit at any cost to society. But that shift will be viewed by many - outside the CBI - as profoundly welcome.
This was a firm statement of belief in the mixed economy, where government makes the rules, where business works within it.
Of course I don't agree with all of it, and I want more. But in many ways Ed Miliband was arguing for the type of economy I am calling for in my forthcoming book. It's hard for me to disagree with the direction of travel in that case: indeed, I warmly welcome it.
More than that, whilst Ed Balls' five point plan on Monday was again not as bold as wished but showed all the right sentiments then maybe this speech does just the same thing. Maybe this is the start of a well crafted shift Labour wants to deliver and it lays the foundation for the real re-establishment of social democracy right outside the neoliberal fold.
I hope so.
But Ed Miliband's also got to get the presentation right.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
The problem isn’t that Labour/Labour leaders can’t make the right noises, but that the rhetoric is rarely matched by deeds.
I thought the delivery started off fine but then seemed to drop off… it just felt a bit awkward. I’ve seen Ed do speeches with much better delivery than that and indeed if you watch Youtube footage of him speaking to Labour activists during the leadership campaign, he was excellent. He needs to go for a more fluid presentational style, perhaps walking around the stage without notes like Cameron does sometimes.
Ed was best when he abandoned the New Labour stance completely (e.g. attacking ‘predators’ in business). He was worst when he failed to break out of the New Labour mould (e.g. the attack on benefit claimants, which was just pandering to Mail/Express reader prejudices.) Ed has made half a break from New Labour, which is better than no break at all, and hopefully he will get bolder as he goes on.
That benefits bit has really annoyed people
But I have to have hope
As soon as Ed Miliband drops his ridiculous position of not dropping tory spending plans and comes up with a coherent alternative strategy to promote the growth of the economy rather than saying he is to continue with disastrous austerity policies that hinder and contract the economy, I will believe he has moved away from neoliberalism.
Stop worrying about the media Ed…….people are crying out for a bold and imaginative economic policy to counter the junk economics of the ConDems.
In short. grow a pair!
Looking forward to reading your latest book Richard.
Already cleared a space on my book shelf next to:-
Treasure Islands – Nicholas Shaxson
Ill Fares The Land – Tony Judt
Both of which should be compulsory reading for everyone with the slightest interest in facing the future.
Both are great books
I’m not claiming to join their company