Alistair Darling says, according to the FT, of his banker’s bonus tax:
“I think it will be a one-off thing because, frankly, the very people you are after here are very good at getting out of these things and . . . will find all sorts of imaginative ways of avoiding it in the future,” Mr Darling said at a financial services conference sponsored by Nomura, the Japanese investment bank.
Well, that’s a staggering insight. And I am sorely tempted to say “I told you so”.
There were always vastly better ways to tax banks to change behaviour. A one off levy was never going to be one.
It succeeded in raising revenue — which was good — but it was never going to achieve more.
Now let’s move on and tackle the agenda I set out in Taxing Banks. That will tackle the problem for the benefit of us all. We could start with a financial transaction tax‚Ķ..
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Buy me a coffee!
Alistair Darling, although a much more balanced personality than Gordon Brown and reputedly much nicer to work for, is not that great on economic policy, sadly – and this comment just reflects that. (Not that Brown didn’t have his problems on economic policy as well, of course – listening far too much to Irwin Stelzer, for instance).
Alistair’s said he’ll step down as Shadow Chancellor when the results of the Labour party leadership election come through. I think Ed Balls would be a good choice as his replacement (assuming Ed B doesn’t win the leadership – this looks unlikely as I can’t find anyone who’s voted for him yet).
And also hopefully move forward to remove or at least curb the hugely unnecessary and wasteful tax-payer-funded welfare fincos receive by way of the tax deductability of interest payments on their debts (excluding deposit liabilities and equity liabilities). With an estimated debt level of around £5 trillion at last count it continues to baffle me that the Treasury refuses to estimate how much this tax shield and welfare to bankers is actually costing the tax-payer every year – leaving aside the wider cost to the economy and future generations of continuing to promote debt-fuelled growth at the expense of real jobs.