News reaches me of a meeting of the EU’s Tax Code of Conduct Group, held last week.
This Group was established to monitor compliance with the EU Code of Conduct on Business Taxation — established in 1997.
Aficionados of this blog will know that in the wake of publication of this Code — with which the UK’s Crown Dependencies are obliged to comply since they are part of the UK for these purposes — The Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey (in that order) announced plans to create what were described as zero/ten corporate tax systems.
Suffice to say, I was one of the leading critics of this move and when an advisor to a committee of the States of Jersey in 2005 exposed Jersey’s plans as hopelessly non-compliant with the Code. It followed that the Isle of Man’s and Guernsey’s were too. The reason was simple: the proposed arrangements kept in place the ring fence that the EU Code was meant to abolish: it just claimed to move it from company tax law to personal tax law. So, as a result local companies remained taxable and those owned by all other people — even if trading in Jersey, Guernsey or the Isle of Man were not. This was blatantly abusive under the EU Code and last year the UK told the Crown Dependencies this was the case (at long last, and after a lot of publicity on the issue from the likes of me).
Each island has now to come up with new tax laws.
Guernsey has said it will do a 10% flat tax rate, irrespective of ownership.
Jersey and the Isle of Man have not announced plans yet.
So, last week the EU’s Tax Code of Conduct Group met and considered their responses.
Guernsey they decided is off the hook for now: a 10% across the board tax will keep the EU happy.
As for Jersey and the Isle of Man: no news to the EU was not good news for them. Their tax arrangements are to assessed formally in September. I gather Spain and the UK are gunning for Jersey and the Isle of Man and are putting on tons of pressure for rejection of the current arrangement.
Expect a lot of lobbying of Tory and Lib Dem politicians from the Crown Dependencies before September then.
This one is vital: when imposing cuts on everyone else will the Con Dems stand up to the tax havens or not?
There’s one to watch out for — and the fireworks will surely fly if they let the Crown Dependencies off the hook.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Richard
Guernsey has not yet committed to a 10% rate. It made an early statement (which really angered Jersey and the Isle of Man) that a likely rate of 10% might be assumed, but it is very clear that Guernsey is keeping an open mind. A 10% rate has not been formally proposed to the States of Guernsey and the latter has not yet debated anything on the subject.
Whilst a 10% rate may well result, it is nowhere near as certain as you infer.
The last I heard about this, as reported to the public, was that the Guernsey 10% stance had been backtracked and that they were waiting..The Chief Minister was heavily criticised by the industry for having played a suggestive card too early….
But then I suppose the public will be last to find out….
This comment has been deleted as it did not meet the moderation criteria for this blog specified here: http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/comments/. The editor’s decision is final.