There's an article with the above title on the Guardian's Comment is Free site today, with the subheading:
A thinktank that claims to be unbiased is promoting dangerous tax policies that will widen the gap between rich and poor.
I recommend it. But there again, I wrote it. That though is not the reason for recommending it. The last paragraph is. This is what worries and motivated me:
Whatever the motive, the IFS's claim to be unbiased appears to me shaky. Some of its proposals are very dangerous indeed and about as far removed from the characteristics of a good tax system for any open developed economy in the 21st century as it is possible to be.
I genuinely believe that to be true.
This debate will run.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

Buy me a coffee!

Your article is the same as stuff you’ve posted here before. I agreed with you then and I agree with you now. I used to quite like the IFS but they have clearly lost the plot. OK, I dislike their mad plans for different reasons to you, but hey …