Counter-intuitive form

Posted on

Robert Peston wrote this in the Guardian yesterday:

True to its counter-intuitive form, this government has eschewed a progressive remedy: a flat £30,000 tax is by definition regressive, hurting those at the bottom of the income scale and an irrelevance to the billionaires. Surely Gordon Brown would not view his Britain as a land fit only for plutocrats - and not for foreign-born software engineers and Chinese language teachers?

He's right to raise the question.

But he shouldn't expect a reasonable answer. James Purnell (a minister, no less) has called Labour an ideology free zone. And as Polly Toynbee put it on Friday:

First mistake, Gordon Brown appoints a rabid Tory to be a minister - yes a minister - in the government without even joining the party. Digby Jones has proved to be as damaging an enemy within as the old Militant Tendency.

In this scenario logical policy is a random event.


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:

  • Richard Murphy

    Read more about me

  • Support This Site

    If you like what I do please support me on Ko-fi using credit or debit card or PayPal

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Taxing wealth report 2024

  • Newsletter signup

    Get a daily email of my blog posts.

    Please wait...

    Thank you for sign up!

  • Podcast

  • Follow me

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn

    Mastodon

    @RichardJMurphy

    BlueSky

    @richardjmurphy.bsky.social