I noticed all the garbage about tax freedom day last week, which is in fact an attack on society as we currently structure it. I thought I should add some objective data to the nonsense that the Adam Smith Institute and others on the far-right publish on this.
I recently did an analysis of tax paid during Gordon Brown's years as Chancellor using IFS data on tax paid and Treasury information on GDP. Put the two together and during Gordon Brown's ten year tenure of 11 Downing Street the aggregate average proportion of GDP paid as tax has been 38.56%.
During the ten previous years when the Conservatives were in office the aggregate average proportion of GDP paid as tax was 38.56%. You read that right. To the second decimal place the figures are the same.
Three things come from this:
1) Those who argue for substantial tax cuts are arguing for a fundamental change in our society, not just an alternative government.
2) There is a consensus in our society that accepts that tax is due and beneficial
3) Much (but not all) of what has been written about Gordon Brown's chancellorship is wrong.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
re : your assertion that ‘ Those who argue for substantial tax cuts are arguing for a fundamental change in our society, not just an alternative government.’ Such argument is part of the democratic process as we know it and surely if an ‘alternative’ government does not introduce substantial tax cuts in one vital respect it is not an alternative at all. Ours is not the best of all possible governments and a mature democracy should provide the opportunity to find out what it would be. Regards.
Richard
If you can win a mandate that’s fine.
What I resent is the fact that the accountancy profession seems to think it’s the professions job to achieve this change
Richard