I first published what I called A Manifesto for Tax Justice in October 2010. I've now updated it a bit. This new version is also available as a PDF, here.
Summary
The UK is facing the largest round of cuts in government spending ever proposed by a Whitehall administration.
At the same time the UK faces:
- The biggest ever tax gap in its history[i].
- The lowest number of staff ever employed by HM Revenue & Customs[ii].
- The lowest headline and effective rates of corporation tax in its history[iii].
- Low levels of tax for its banks[iv].
- High levels of corporate tax avoidance[v].
- Significant errors in tax administration[vi].
There are numerous indications that large sections of the UK population find it unacceptable and want action to be taken to address these issues.
This Briefing sets out a manifesto the tax justice - a demand for changes that would transform the way in British taxation policy and management that could help us tackle the deficit in ways that so far most politicians have refused to embrace.
Cuts and the Tax Gap
We note
- The on-going cuts planned by the Coalition government[vii].
- That there is a tax gap in the UK made up of £70 billion of tax evasion, £25 billion of tax avoidance and £25 billion of unpaid tax[viii].
- That the government has got rid of 35,000 employees at H M Revenue & Customs and is planning to get rid of 10,000 more over the next three years[ix].
- The massive errors in the calculation of people's tax bills by H M Revenue & Customs[x].
We demand:
- That the government stop the cuts.
- That all job cuts at H M Revenue & Customs be cancelled.
- That 20,000 new staff be recruited at H M Revenue & Customs to tackle the tax gap.
- That H M Revenue & Customs be told to raise the right amount of tax at the right time from the right person and that it be given the resources necessary to ensure it can do so.
- That we have a General Anti-avoidance Provision that bans tax avoidance[xi].
- The tax system is made progressive so that the rich always pay more than the poor[xii].
Business tax and the banks
We note
- That big business is not paying the tax expected of it[xiii].
- That big business is the only part of the economy expecting a tax cut over the next four years[xiv].
- That by 2014 big business will be paying tax at lower rates than any small business and any individual in the UK[xv].
- That the banks who created the current financial crisis are paying very little tax as a result of it[xvi].
- That the government is opposing a Robin Hood Tax on the riskiest transactions banks undertake that could raise billions of pounds a year[xvii].
We demand:
- That tax laws applicable to big business be rigorously imposed.
- That planned tax cuts for big business be cancelled.
- That banks be denied tax relief on losses already funded by the state.
- That the bankers' bonus tax be made permanent.
- That the government introduce a Robin Hood Tax instead of the bank levy.
- That country-by-country reporting be required of big business so anyone can monitor where they make their profits and pay their taxes[xviii].
Tax havens
We note:
- That the UK is responsible for ten tax havens[xix].
- The UK is itself a tax haven for rich foreigners because of its domicile rule[xx].
- There has been almost no progress in increasing transparency in tax havens[xxi].
- Latest deals with tax havens like Switzerland confirm their right to provide banking secrecy[xxii].
- Tax havens are estimated to cost the UK £18.5 billion a year[xxiii].
We demand:
- That the UK force its tax havens to reform
- That the UK domicile rule be abolished
- That automatic exchange of information between states on income earned by people and companies be established so that no one can hide their income from tax authorities
- That deals that preserve banking secrecy with Switzerland and other states be scrapped before they are signed
- That the secrecy surrounding offshore companies and trusts be banned.
Endnotes
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
I know that you are of the view that only a teeny weeny bit of public revenue could be raised by LVT, but you have also said that you see LVT as one tax amongst many (or words to that effect). Seeing that it is not avoidable, surely it should be on this list of demands? And if not LVT, how about raising a higher proportion of public revenue through the existing property taxes?
Yes RM I also believe there should be a root and branch reform of the tax system.
I can see parallels with the Chartist movement of the 19th Century. But please keep the movement for a reform a broad coalition. Don’t make it a a Left wing exclusivity.Taxation needs consent of the payers, and they aint all going to be left wing.
But if the right oppose anything that means those with means pay a fair share then this will have to be imposed
The Chartists weren’t compromisers
I absolutely agree with the sentiment.
However, I cannot help but be sceptical of a document that references it’s own author’s words. Your points would be made more forcefully if the references came from a neutral source, and from a range of sources at that – it’s to easy to dismiss them when all but two come from your own website or the TUC. If these statements are true, they must be backed up with some documentation.
This is however a minor point. A good manifesto, and good luck with it.