Liechtenstein: the alternative view

Posted on

In between BBC appearances (I think there will be 5 today) I note that Christian Aid have commented on the UK / Liechtenstein deal, saying:

The UK government’s new tax deal with Liechtenstein amounts to a welcome admission that much-hyped tax information exchange agreements (TIEAs) do not work, Christian Aid says today.

‚ÄòThe fact that the UK has signed two agreements today – a TIEA and a second one, ensuring that uncooperative UK taxpayers have their Liechtenstein accounts shut down  - is a clear sign that TIEAs are almost impossible to use,’ says Christian Aid Policy Manager Alex Cobham.

‘They are extraordinarily bureaucratic and riddled with get-out clauses. If TIEAs were an effective way for tax authorities to combat tax dodging, then there would have been no need for the second agreement.

‚ÄòNow that the UK has acknowledged that it needs more than a TIEA to crack down on its own tax dodgers, we hope it will apply the same logic to developing countries. Their tax authorities have far fewer resources than our own in the UK and are therefore even less able to use TIEAs to collect the revenues that are rightly theirs.’

Christian Aid estimates that developing countries lose at least $160 billion a year to tax dodging by multinational companies alone.

Mr Cobham adds: ‚ÄòThe G20 should now reflect this acceptance that TIEAs do not work by urgently bringing forward a new multilateral agreement on tax information sharing. Information must be exchanged automatically, to ensure that developing countries benefit.’

I think the point that the second deal proves that the TIEA does not work is absolute valid.

And I see no way that a deal of this sort will be offered to a developing country so Christian Aid are right to complain on that score.

And there’s no doubt, Automatic Information Exchange is the only way forward: it’s AIE that puts the E into TIEA. Without it the prospect of Exchange is minimal.

And that’s what continues to worry me.