From yesterday’s Guardian:

A group of super-rich entrepreneurs, models and pop stars are demanding tax breaks to encourage them to give billions more to good causes that tackle international poverty, disease and climate change.

Under the plan half of all money donated through it would be deducted from an individual or company’s tax liability. It is in effect a cash-back scheme, with the government promising to make up the other 50% from its aid budget. The scheme would apply to companies and non-domiciled taxpayers as well, so it could reach the richest Britons who manage their tax affairs through offshore entities.

From today’s Guardian:

As the tax campaigner Richard Murphy points out, this is fundamentally undemocratic. Depressingly, Mirrlees and Mehta have already been granted two meetings with the Treasury, at which they insisted the scheme should be extended to those whose tax affairs are offshore, in effect allowing the use of UK taxpayers’ money to be directed by tax exiles – and giving them tax relief for the privilege.

This has to be one of the most abusive schemes I have heard of for a long time. Bono would love it – more tax releif than they ever pay for hypothecating the entire overseas aid budget to their chosen photo opportunistic development causes and making darned sure none goes to essential exercises such as ensuring that the tax systems of developing countries are enhanced to make sure the companies owned by the very rich pay their taxes there.

Heaven forbid.

The insanity of the wealthy in our society is becoming clearer by the day.

And note the involvement of Sir James Mirrless – the man who is heading the Institute of Fiscal Studies current pl;ans to reform the UK tax system by shifting all corporation tax liabilities onto VAT so that the burden of tax moves from the wealthiest in society to the poorest.

I guess w should see this current plan as another part of his clear plan to increase the wealth gap in the UK.

Note to the IFS: stick with this man and you’ll be out in the political wilderness for a very long time. He’s quite clearly lost his ethical bearings, Nobel prize or not.

Feb 282009
 

This from the Guardian this morning:

Lobby group Tax Justice Network says up to 75 countries, including large states such as Belgium, Austria, Britain and even the United States, should be considered offshore centres and adds that tax authorities every year miss $250 billion out of $11.5 trillion of undeclared wealth stashed abroad.
But matters are changing rapidly.
“The writing has been on the wall for many years,” Philip Marcovici, partner and tax expert at law firm Baker & McKenzie. “What we are seeing, however, is unprecedented coordination among governments to go after tax revenues associated with assets and income located abroad.”

When one of the biggest firms of lawyers, with whom I have crossed swords on occassion, says that the writing is on the wall then I think we can safely say it is.

But vigilance is still needed: the devil will always be in the detail. This will take years to agree.

 

World Bank Governors have approved a first phase of reforms to increase the influence of developing countries within the World Bank Group, including adding a seat for Sub-Saharan Africa to allow developing countries a majority of seats on the Executive Board, and expanding voting and capital shares.

About time too, I say

 

These are my links for February 27th:

Mid Ocean News

 Tax Havens  Comments Off
Feb 272009
 

Mid Ocean News of Bermuda reports that:

“SUPPORT has poured in this week following Sir John Swan’s call for Bermuda to embrace a role as a Mid-Atlantic Monaco – a haven for the rich to live tax-free while boosting our economy.

However, those who approve of the former Premier’s plan to encourage wealthy foreigners to relocate here do not believe it will be workable under the current Government’s term limits policy.

In last week’s Mid-Ocean News, Sir John called for Bermuda to become a “wealth management country”, attracting wealthy foreign tax exiles to the island and granting them long-term residency to “manage their affairs here” and invest in property and services.”

They still don’t get it do they?

Tax havens are dying and still they go on thinking of new ways to perpetuate the abuse.

 

Willem Buiter writing for the FT says:

There is the need and opportunity to close down all tax havens and regulatory havens.  Tax havens are defined as countries that have bank secrecy, which includes Switzerland, Austria and Luxembourg as well as the usual micro-state suspects (bank secrecy or bank privacy is the legal principle according to which banks can protect personal information about their customers, even from the tax authorities and police authorities of these customers).  The anonymity provided by bank secrecy promotes tax evasion, tax avoidance (or fraud), money laundering and hiding the proceeds of criminal activity.  Regulatory havens are nations that offer companies the opportunity to avoid global standards for reporting, governance, auditing, transparency, openness etc.  Tax havens and regulatory havens are key elements in the global regulatory and tax arbitrage games that have undermined government revenue bases and weakened global regulatory standards.

The means to put tax havens out of business are simple: forbid banks, other financial institutions and private persons from doing business with and engaging in transactions with banks and other financial institutions located in countries that have bank secrecy.  To take care of regulatory havens, don’t recognise and enforce contracts drawn up under their laws and do not recognise  court judgements originating from tax havens.

You can’t get much more blunt than that.

The message is getting to the core of the economic intelligentsia.

As I’ve said time and again: the writing is now on the wall.

 

Swiss banking secrecy is being challenged again, this time in the United States..

Quite right too. The argument that it had anything to do with the Jews is, thankfully, fairly laid to rest here.

Swiss banking secrecy was created to facilitate tax evasion. That is the beginning and end of it.

That’s why it also has to go.

 

I upgraded my blog software last night

I am having considerable problems as a result

With a little help I hope normal appearance posting will resume soon

In the meantime apologies if things go awry occasionally

 

From Accounting Web:

The AccountingWEB.co.uk blog round-up: Who to watch – 26 Feb 2009.

The blogs to watch

© 2005 - 2011 Tax Research UK.
Some rights reserved. Creative Commons License
Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha