Just in case anyone is feeling smug about Germany’s problem with Liechtenstein, remember this: the UK operates a ring fence so that it is a
Read the full article…
The FT asks how should non-domiciled residents be taxed?
Counter-intuitive form
Robert Peston wrote this in the Guardian yesterday: True to its counter-intuitive form, this government has eschewed a progressive remedy: a flat £30,000 tax is
Read the full article…
Sympathy for the non-doms is waning
The backlash against the City’s campaign to keep the domicile rule is mounting. The Times’ personal finance editor, Andrew Ellson says: there should be no
Read the full article…
Domicile: The conclusions
I’ve written a lot on domicile in the last couple of days. More could be written on the domicile debate than I have. But the
Read the full article…
Domicile: Pragmatic question 4: Low income workers
It’s been argued that the changes in the domicile rule will be especially harmful to low income workers who come from mainly European countries to
Read the full article…
Domicile: The Mirror wades in
The Daily Mirror is a paper that rarely gets a look in here. But its waded into the domicile issue today in style, saying: Holding
Read the full article…
Domicile: John Whiting gets it right
Accountancy Age has reported that John Whiting of PWC has said of the proposed changes to the domicile rule that: There is a serious concern
Read the full article…
Domicile: Pragmatic question 3: Why do we want to give a tax subsidy to the City?
If all the claims made are to be accepted as true (and that’s a massive ‘if’ – since most of them are not) then most
Read the full article…