One of my pleasures in life these days is not travelling nearly as much as I used to.
The only way in which this blog and my video channel work is on the basis of not spending too much time on the move. It is now very hard for me to recall just how much time I did, in the past, spend travelling, both for tax justice campaigning and then, in particular, whilst I was at City, University of London, when I was heavily engaged in the production of research over a range of universities in at least seven countries in Europe. At one time during the 2010s, it was rare for me to be in the UK for more than two weeks at a time, so often was I travelling.
All of this is a roundabout way of saying that today is an exception to the general rule that I start my day at home, working on the blog. I am instead of heading very early for London, and the annual conference/workshop of Accounting Streams, which is being held at UCL‘s Canary Wharf campus today.
For reasons best known to my colleagues, I am this morning‘s keynote speaker, discussing my work on sustainable cost accounting, and in particular the theoretical discussions in the appendices to this paper, which was completed in January this year.
Sustainable cost accounting would put the cost of the transition to net zero on the balance sheet of the major corporations that are bound to be most impacted. At present, they can effectively pretend that this issue does not exist within their financial statements, with the rules on sustainability accounting produced by the International Accounting Standards Federation amounting to little more than greenwash, creating a set of rules where companies are pretty much able to decide themselves what they will disclose, and to then mark their own homework.
My approach is fundamentally different. I want a robust set of accounting rules to demonstrate which companies might, and might not, be able to command sufficient capital to invest in the necessary process of transition that they are going to have to undertake. This process will be necessary for companies to survive in the long term. Without such information, I cannot see how it is possible for our financial markets to properly allocate capital at present, when a black hole big enough to potentially envelop many of our quoted companies looms over them, and yet is ignored by financial reporting.
My son, and videographer, Thomas, is joining me in London today and is recording some of the day's events. The result is that my presentation may be available on this channel sometime soon. Alternatively, we will make a video in our usual format on the theme that I am presenting to explain this idea, which I believe is critical to any government‘s necessary approach to determining the use of capital in our societies if any form of capitalism is to survive the transition to net zero.
With a range of other innovative papers and discussions being presented today, it has all the makings of an enjoyable day out. However, an early start and concentration on academic presentations will disrupt my work here. I hope you will understand if moderation has to fit into the gaps.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
I look forward to hearing more. High time this was on the books.
Resource accounting is absolutely crucial to the fate of the human race.
We have been blind sided by capitalism that in striving to deliver what we need and too much of what we don’t need (and I’m trying to be fair here), it has not been honest with us about the real costs to the planet and us of what it has been selling to us.
Those costs are coming home to roost right now. From global warming, to the diesel car emission fiasco, air travel and vicious wars over resources (Gaza being the latest iteration) – the list is very long. We’ve taken too much and not put enough back.
This is really important work. We’ve got to stop grabbing and start thinking.
Thanks