The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee kept interest rates and quantitative easing policy on a steady path yesterday, but did nonetheless respond to suggestions that there may be short term inflation within the UK economy.
Their newly expressed sentiment appears to suggest that interest rate rises may happen sooner than expected. Before anyone gets too excited though that means rates may rise to 0.25% by the end of 2022 and to 0.5% by 2024. This is change at very modest rate, and largely symbolic in that case.
Perhaps as significant was a hint of unwinding QE. The suggestion was made that when rates reach 0.5% the Bank of England will no longer reinvest the proceeds of the £875bn of government bonds it holds once they mature. The next effect may be unwinding of QE by maybe £60bn a year, on average. It has until now suggested that they would not start this process until rates reached 1.5 per cent.
What does this mean? I suggest four things. First, there is a lot of posturing going on here. There is a pretence that this forward indication is of significance, but all this actually does is satisfy the egos at the Bank, of which there are many. They wish to be seen to be doing something, and these words come pretty cheap.
Second, the reality is that the can has been kicked down the road: this is all talk about what might happen a long time hence in economic terms. For example, the Bank is still assuming the economic impact of Delta variant Covid is small, and that will then be it for the pandemic: few epidemiologists share their confidence. I rather suspect that by the time the end of 2022, let alone 2024, comes around the economy may be vey different, and not as strong as the current Bank outlook suggests likely.
Third, the Bank thinks it is acceptable for it to suggest tightening the economy by withdrawing significant funds from it just when the Chancellor is indicating that a new round of austerity is on the cards. Is it that they both want to bring on a recession? Or is it that they do not talk to each other? Or do they just think that hardship is good for the country? Whatever the reason, suggesting tightening fiscal and monetary policy over the next couple of years when recovery is already proving to be hard is economic foolhardiness, to be polite.
Fourth, I suggest that what is really being said is that the Bank has no clue what is happening, so noise alone will do for now. I take nothing said as being cast in stone, or even likely to happen. Events are likely to prove these musings by the Bank to be of little consequence.
The rocky ride is not over yet. It would help if the Bank recognised that. But in the meantime their inaction should be taken as tacit acknowledgement that they do.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Not directly related to BoE – but regarding prospects for inflation – did I really hear the OFGEN person say they were raising standard energy tariffs by a record amount in order to keep a swathe of retail energy companies in business, despite the fact that the ‘big six’ suppliers who also produces – and not only sell – energy are making billions in profits?
Is this the ultimate ‘the market knows best’ fetish?
The ‘market (among the pure retail energy companies ) works to reduce your bills, but only if we first jack up your bills to allow for the quasi monopoly profitsof the big six’.
Presumably the purer market solution would allow these retail companies to fail – and then cap prices on the big six?
Is this worth a RM post?
This is not a market, at all…..
Succinctly put. But what kind of country/economy goes through this ridiculous pretence, wasting overyone’s time ‘ shopping around’ and raising bills to the point of unaffordability for millions.
No, it’s a cartel. And a dangerous one, at that.
I felt that too that Bank is actually just riding the waves at the moment. ‘Events Dear Boy’ and all that.
I was not surprised however to hear of belt tightening further along the line. They’re like a stuck record the lot of them. And ignorant to the consequences.
I was never a huge fan of the Bundesbank in the 80s and 90s but in one regard they got it spot on. It did not matter how many times they were asked (or in what way) “when are you going to change rates?” the answer was always the same – we thing rates are correct for current conditions, when conditions change, rates will be changed.
The BoE is on a fools errand trying to forecast rates….. why not admit it? Just say we will respond to events.
Agreed